Laserfiche WebLink
Manna Pro Corp. -3- March ~14, 2008 <br /> Claim No. 67$ <br /> 3 <br /> 1 <br /> B. In-Situ Soil Remediatio'p,�� <br /> ' • ' METHOD: soil vapor extraction y? ' <br /> .. a ..k <br /> DURATION: Sep 01through present ' <br /> C. Groundwater Remedia$ion: <br /> ' . METHOD: air sparging i <br /> DURATION: Sep 03{through present <br /> D. Groundwater Trends:.-:, , <br /> • Benzene trends are shown below <br /> I <br /> r <br /> Claim 678 <br /> +. . . . . . . . 30000 <br /> 25000, <br /> MW71: .. <br /> 3 20000 <br /> MW=2' <br /> 15000 MW-3 <br /> N_ 10000 MW-6 <br /> f m 5000 ='. <br /> o -- � - : <br /> o`5 Q'5 Zk d. o`' 0`9 o`O o`O o'� oA <br /> j <br /> Time . <br /> VII. SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY: one well identified within /2 mile of the site <br /> Vill. COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> A. 'Site Description: former retail gasoline station <br /> B.;Site History. the extent of groundwater contamination is defined <br /> ! C.'`Groundwater Monitoring Summary: strong monitoring history <br /> D. Remediation Summary: soil vapor extraction and air sparging <br /> E. Contaminant Exposure Pathway Evaluation: unknown <br /> 1 <br /> { <br /> { <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency F <br /> P.a Recycled Paper . - <br />