Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> � Manna Pro Corp. -3- � , March 5, 2009 j <br /> }` Claim No. 678 ' <br /> A. Soil Excavation: several thousand cubic yards-of contaminated soil were <br /> excavated <br /> 4•' <br /> B. In-Situ Soil Remediation: <br /> • METHOD: soil vapor, extraction ,. <br /> • DURATION: ,;Sep 03;through present <br /> C. Groundwater Remediation: : s` <br /> • METHOD: air sparging <br /> •" DURATION- ''Sep 03,�through present <br /> D. Groundwater Trends: <br /> • Benzene trends are shown below <br /> . I y <br /> ' r BENZENE,Results forJMW 1 �' ; ;` 4 Y <br /> Qr <br /> 30000 <br /> 1Y <br /> i. <br /> 1 � <br /> 255000 <br /> ! 20000 - s <br /> X0000 <br /> Iha .t•+ �r��� �' ��` �,�as a "��� <br /> 5000 <br /> 1' <br /> BENZENE Trend <br /> VI1. SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY one well identified within Y2 mile of the site E <br /> Vlll.. COMMENTS AND JUSTIFICATION FOR.RECOMMENDED ACTION-.,�.: <br /> A. Site Description: former.retail gasoline station` <br /> ,1 <br /> B. Site History: the extent'of groundwater contamination is defined <br /> t C. Groundwater Monitoring Summary: strong:monitoring history: <br /> D. Remediation Summary: soil vapor extraction and air sparging <br /> E. Contaminant Exposure Pathway Evaluation: unknown <br /> f <br /> : <br /> 6 <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> P.p�Aecyd d Paper <br />