My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
4004
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544711
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2019 2:03:41 PM
Creation date
7/30/2019 1:45:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0544711
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005478
FACILITY_NAME
CUTTER LUMBER
STREET_NUMBER
4004
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17525005
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4004 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E i4`iI,C�J' SIN i AL HEAI_TI <br /> l 94 DEC -5 PM 2= 44 <br /> PILOT TESTING REPORT <br /> AND <br /> CONCEPTUAL CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN <br /> MANNA PRO CORPORATION FACILITY <br /> 4004 EL DORADO STREET <br /> STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA <br /> i <br /> ij <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> i <br /> This Executive Summary summarizes pertinent findings and conclusions of the Pilot Testing Report and <br /> Conceptual Corrective Action Plan, Manna Pro Corporation Facility, 4004 El Dorado Street Stockton,. <br /> California, dated July 15, 1994 (the "Report"). <br /> This Executive Summary was prepared at the request of San Joaquin County Public Health Services" <br /> (SJCPHS) and only summarizes some of the findings and conclusions set forth in the Report. It does <br /> not, nor is it intended to, describe the factual and scientific basis for the findings and conclusions set <br /> forth, nor does it describe past work performed at the site, or the geological, hydrological or other <br /> characteristics of the site, where such matters have been described in other reports. ANY PARTIES <br /> INTERESTED IN THE SITE REMEDIATION ARE CAUTIONED TO REVIEW THE REPORT IN FULL FOR <br /> ALL PARTICULARS ABOUT THE SITE CONDITIONS PILOT TESTING WORK AND RECOMMENDED <br /> REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES. . <br /> The objective of the work performed by Groundwater Technology, Inc., and described in the Report (the <br /> "Pilot Testing Work") was to further quantify groundwater and soil vaporflow characteristics under <br /> various vacuum and pumping influences to determine a cost effective remedial action technology <br /> appropriate for removal of gasoline and diesel fuel hydrocarbons detected in the soil and.groundwater at <br /> the site. <br /> The Pilot Testing Work had essentially four components: <br /> i) Installing one extraction well and three observation wells for the purposes of conducting <br /> the pilot testing described below; <br /> ii) performing a constant-rate aquifer test (which involved groundwater pumping only); <br /> i iii) performing a combined groundwater extraction and high-vacuum soil vapor extraction <br /> (HVE) test (which involved pumping groundwater from the extraction well using a <br /> r centrifugal pump and applying a vacuum to the well to extract soil vapors and enhance <br /> groundwater flow from the well); and <br /> iv) performing a high-vacuum dual-phase extraction (HVDPE) test (which involved applying <br /> a vacuum to the well to extract both soil vapors and groundwater from the well). <br /> I <br /> GROUNDWATER <br /> '71�! - _i TECHNOLOGY, INC. <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.