My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009408
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
4004
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544711
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009408
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2019 3:14:46 PM
Creation date
7/30/2019 2:01:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009408
RECORD_ID
PR0544711
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005478
FACILITY_NAME
CUTTER LUMBER
STREET_NUMBER
4004
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17525005
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4004 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil Sampling <br /> Soil samples were taken at 5-foot intervals, or at significant lithologic <br /> changes in the sail, beginning at' field forelow evident the of contamanatlon�samples were examined in the <br /> Examination included visual observations and detections of odor <br /> Selected soil samples thra California mtted oadified split-spoon sampler <br />' sis Soil <br /> samples were taken w <br /> fitted with brass tube liners. The split-spoon sampler and brass <br /> liners were with <br /> pen water All augers and bor to use with an Alconox its s were water solution <br /> steam <br />' then rinsed vvi II <br /> cleaned prior to beginning all bonngs <br /> Soil samples were collected by inserting the sampler into the augers <br />' and hammering it into the soil to the desired depth The sampler <br /> was then removed from the augers, and the brass liner containing <br /> the sample was removed from the sampler The soil sample was <br /> examined for evidence of contamination Any brass tubes containing <br /> samples exhibiting evidence of contamination were covered with <br /> Teflon tape and coverplastic <br /> boring number,i samhplee ntervas <br /> al The <br /> brass tubes were labeled with the <br /> depth, sampler's iaixnobile laboratory located on site a samples were <br /> then submitted to <br /> Samples of first aquifer formation were collected <br /> doreve lasso <br /> ysis <br /> and permeability testing Samples of cl were <br /> collected for permeability testing <br /> Sampling of Stockpiled Soil <br /> Twenty-five composite samples of the contaminated stockpiled soil <br />' were collected to characterize Each compositersample wases remediation <br /> composed of <br /> permitting procedures <br /> four discrete soil samples The four discrete samples were collected <br />' approximately every 12 feet throughout the length of the pile at a <br /> minimum depth of 1 foot below the surface The soil samples were <br /> collected by cutting a hole through the Visqueen that covers the <br />' stockpiles Each discrete sample was collected by pounding a brass <br /> tube into the soil with a mallet The brass tubes were retrieved and <br /> covered with Teflon tape and capped with plastic caps to make <br /> airtight seals The brass tubes were labeled with the sample <br />' number, sampler's initials, date, time, location, and analysis <br /> required The sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form and in <br /> a field book. The samples were then submitted to a mobile laboratory <br /> located on-site. <br /> 2-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.