Laserfiche WebLink
Pilot Testing Report and Conceptual Corrective Action Plan July 15, 1994 <br /> Manna Pro, 4004 South EI Dorado, Stockton, CA 17 <br /> ' applied to the well was increased in three stages Groundwater levels in adjacent observation points <br /> were recorded using data loggers Sod vapor was withdrawn from the extraction well at a known <br /> vacuum and the resultant vapor flow rate was recorded Incremental increases in the vapor flow rate <br /> were made at the extraction well and the vacuum response induced in the subsurface was measured <br /> at the adjacent observation well vapor monitoring probes (observation points) and recorded for each <br /> of the extraction rates The vacuum at each observation point was quantified using a magnahelic <br /> gauge By examining the vacuum response and groundwater level fluctuations at surrounding <br /> observation points, an effective radius of influence for sod vapor extraction and groundwater capture <br /> zone was determined <br /> Data collected during the combined groundwater pumping and HVE test was analyzed to evaluate <br />' the applicability of this remedial technology for this site In addition, the effluent air stream from the <br /> extraction points was analyzed to assess the hydrocarbon discharge concentrations <br /> 522 Field Activities <br /> The combined groundwater pumping and HVE test was conducted on October 26, 1993 Before <br /> conducting the test, an exemption from air permit requirements from the San Joaquin Valley Unified <br /> Air Pollution Control District was obtained The test was conducted at four stages of increasing <br /> vacuum The groundwater extraction rate was held between 1 and 1 4 gpm during the first three <br /> stages of increasing applied vacuum After the third stage, the groundwater flow rate was increased <br /> to 3 75 gpm The air flow rate, applied vacuum, and field flame-ionization detector (FID) <br /> measurements of the HVE system were recorded at 0 5-hour intervals during the test Also, the <br /> groundwater extraction flow rate and water level data in the observation points were monitored at <br /> 0 5-hour intervals throughout the test Vacuum influence in adjacent observation points was also <br /> recorded <br /> During the fourth stage test, air samples were field analyzed with a FID In addition to the field FID <br /> analyses, an influent air sample was collected in a Tedlar'' air sample bag during the fourth test <br /> stage The sample was analyzed by GTEL for STEX, TPH-G and methane The analytical results are <br /> presented in Appendix A, and discussed in Section 5 2 3 <br /> The extracted sod vapor was treated through one vapor-phase activated carbon unit to remove <br /> . organic compounds present in the soil vapor prior to discharge The activated carbon air stream <br /> 2819R034 070 <br /> GROUNDWATER <br /> E[:]M TECHNOLOGY,INC <br />