Laserfiche WebLink
' Report-Pilot Remedial System Test Page 21 <br /> Former Manna Pro Site <br /> l <br /> Project No 207 3 <br /> ie July 31,2000 <br /> r7.0 SUMMARY OF PILOT TEST RESULTS <br />' 7.1 Discussion of New Soil Analytical Data <br /> The soil analytical data as shown in Summary Table l suggests that gasoline impacted <br /> soil extends from near the groundwater surface at about 25 feet to depths of more than 50 <br />' feet bgs The bulk of the contaminant mass lies between about 35 and 45 feet The new <br /> data is in general agreement with soil data obtained in prior sampling events at the site A <br /> more detailed discussion of the soil data will be forthcoming in the Feasibility Study <br />' Report <br /> 7.2 Discussion of Soil Vapor Extraction Field Work <br /> The ICE equipment was in operation for about 82 hours over the course of 10 calendar <br /> days The equipment was not operated between May 25 and May 29 as discussed above <br />' At the time of the pilot test, the groundwater elevation was about 10 feet above the <br /> highest level of the most intensely impacted soil which hindered the vapor extraction <br /> system Only a relatively low level vacuum could be applied to the system (30-35 inches <br />' of water) as only approximately 5 feet of screen was exposed above the groundwater <br /> table Similarly, the abnormally high water table required that a large head of water be <br /> displaced in the air sparge well (20-25 feet) to initiate sparging This required 0 61 to <br /> I0 76 atmospheres of pressure (9 to 11 psig) to displace the standing water column, not <br /> including additional formation resistance <br /> Gasoline Extraction Rates <br /> The laboratory test data of the 3 air samples show that the gasoline range hydrocarbons in <br />' the air samples had a maximum concentration of 16 mg/1 The other two samples <br /> contained TPH-G concentrations of gasoline of 1 0 and 1 4 mg/l Data Table 3 calculates <br /> the removal of contaminants at various extraction rates Note that for the purpose of <br /> estimating removal rates, the air samples were used as follows <br /> • The initial air sample was used to calculate soil vapor contaminant mass for the first <br /> three days of system operation <br /> • The second air sample was used to estimate air stream concentration up until the start <br /> up of the air sparge system <br />' • The final air sample analysis was used to estimate contaminant concentration for the <br /> operation of the system after the start of air sparging <br />' 2937 Veneman Ave , #8240 Geo-Phase Environmental Inc Phone(209)569-0293 <br /> Modesto, CA 95356 Fax(209)569-0295 <br /> 1 <br />