Laserfiche WebLink
IFormer Manna Pro Site Page 6 <br /> Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 207 2 <br /> . March 2, 2000 <br /> I <br /> 3.0 DISCUSSION <br /> 3.1 Discussion of Data <br /> Field and analytical data results are summarized in Summary Table 1 and <br /> illustrated in Figures 3 through 5 <br /> The map of groundwater gradient (Figure 3) suggests that the flow of <br /> groundwater is to the northeast The water table has risen about V2 foot since <br /> the last monitoring event in October The area of ground water depression <br /> observed in the last monitoring event has largely disappeared, although a <br /> depressed "trough" is still evident <br />' The analytic data suggest that contaminant levels are generally consistent with <br /> what has been observed in past monitoring events Two anomalies of note <br /> concern the analytical results of samples from MW-8 in which an anomalous <br /> "spike" results 1n a high reading of TPH-G The reported TPH-G concentration <br /> of 4480 ppm from that sample does not appear to represent actual aquifer <br /> conditions The other anomaly previously discussed is the presence of traces of <br /> xylene in blank samples It was concluded that this is due to the presence of <br /> xylene in the make-up water used to prepare the blank samples, and that the <br />' xylene was introduced into the water during the distilling, or packaging process <br /> at the manufacturers facility <br />' One sample from the previous monitoring event (MW-1) contained 670 ppb of 1,2 <br /> DCA To further explore the distribution of this chlorinated hydrocarbon, three <br /> samples were tested for the presence of 1,2 DCA in this round of sampling The <br /> three samples were from wells, MW-1, MW-2, and MW-6 None of these samples <br /> contained detectable levels of 1,2 DCA <br /> In general, the presence of gasoline in the groundwater remains at fairly high <br /> levels and is distributed over a rather large area The core of the contaminant <br /> I mass is, however, confined to a relatively small area in the vicinity of the <br /> original release site <br /> 3.2 Future Work Schedule <br /> The San Joaquin County PHS/EHD has approved a Work Plan to conduct <br /> additional site characterization of the deeper groundwater and to complete pilot <br /> level testing of several remedial technologies The California UST Fund <br /> (USTCFP) recently issued a letter of "pre-approval" for reimbursement of the <br /> 2937 Veneman Ave,#B240 Geo-Phase Environmental Inc Phone (209) 569-0293 <br /> Modesto, CA 95356 Fax (209) 569-0293 <br />