Laserfiche WebLink
�� KLEINFELDER <br /> Chevron and PG&E Pipeline Easement Area <br /> It is Kleinfelder's understanding that approximately 300 feet of the Chevron Crude Oil <br /> Pipeline will be removed and replaced by Chevron. This work is currently scheduled over <br /> a three day period beginning on November 7, 2005. The actual cut-out date is scheduled <br /> t for November 9, 2005. The section to be cut out spans the known footprint area <br /> extending though Area B and Area C (Plate 6). The southeastern section of exposed <br /> pipeline (about 70 linear feet) traversing Area A is not scheduled to be cut out since this <br /> ' area was noted as clean based on previous assessments and observations within the <br /> trench in this area. The Chevron Pipeline is currently exposed over the proposed 300- <br /> foot cut-out area. The developer, Pegasus is to provide native backfill material from the <br /> site area (outside the spill footprint area), while Chevron will be responsible for backfilling <br /> the trench and compaction according to their guidelines and pipeline safety/integrity <br /> needs. <br /> Two PG&E pipelines trend parallel and north of the Chevron Pipeline, including high <br /> pressure natural gas pipelines No. 2 (Line 2) and Line 401. Line 2 is 26" in diameter, <br /> buried about 4 feet north of the Chevron Pipeline at approximately 5 feet bgs (top of <br /> pipe). Line 401 is a 36" diameter pipeline, approximately 28 feet north of the Chevron <br /> ' Pipeline and buried about 7 feet bgs. <br /> Kleinflelder, PG&E and Chevron Pipeline representatives visited the site to evaluate soil <br /> conditions near the PG&E Pipeline No. 2 and Line 401 on Friday September 30, 2005. <br /> The selected locations were in Area C in which contamination was noted as deepest in <br /> the area in which the pipelines traversed the spill area. Two bellhole excavations were <br /> conducted to uncover Line 2 and Line 401 (see Plate 6). Mr. Kevin Armato, PG&E's <br /> corrosion engineer checked the wrapping of both Line 2 and Line 401. He commented <br /> that the coatings on both pipes were OK and measurements and coating observations did <br /> not show damage to the wrap or indications that the cathodic protection material had <br /> been damaged due to spilled hydrocarbons. A sample was physically removed from Line <br /> 2 and the coating checked on Line 401. A coating patch was placed on both pipes. Mr. <br /> Bryan Nicholson, Environmental Consultant with PG&E and Kleinfelder both collected soil <br /> samples in and around Line 2 and Line 401. Soils appeared impacted to depths of <br /> approximately 3 feet, but appeared visually clean without evidence of a petroleum odor in <br /> and immediately around Line 2. Field indications of contamination however, were evident <br /> in soil around Line 401. Analytical results showed non detect results around Line 2 and <br /> positive results at the top of Line 401. Contaminants were also detected from a sample <br /> collected at the bottom of Line 401 but at markedly lower concentrations. <br /> Environmental, geotechnical and safety considerations were discussed with both Chevron <br /> and PG&E representative's regarding removal of soil around both the Chevron and PG&E <br /> pipelines. Additional concerns regarding the down time during removal of the Chevron <br /> Pipeline was also of importance to Chevron. Chevron did not wish to shut down their line <br /> ' for longer than three days and the time to remove soil beneath the Chevron Pipeline was <br /> limited to approximately ''/z day, which is interpreted to be 12 hours. Based on, the short <br /> timeline and safety considerations indicated a large excavator should be the type of <br /> 44843.T04/STO5R1333/DH:ly Page 5 of 17 <br /> ©2105 Kleinfelder, Inc. October 25, 2005 <br />