Laserfiche WebLink
• k4 KLEINFELDER <br /> approximately limited to the respective depths and locations where these nine soil samples <br /> were collected, with the exception of PPI, at 19 feet. The estimated depths of petroleum <br /> impacted soil and anticipated future excavation depths as illustrated on Plates 3 and 4 were <br /> partly developed using data from these nine discrete soil samples. <br /> 4) Twelve discrete soil samples were collected and analyzed from perimeter pushprobe borings <br /> G2, G3 and G4 at depths ranging from 5 to 43 feet bgs. Based on this data, it is Kleinfelder's <br /> opinion that petroleum impacted soil has not migrated laterally a significant distance beyond <br /> the footprint area. Please note this finding does not include potential soil vapor migration of <br /> volatile compounds, since soil vapor sampling was not conducted as part of this assessment. <br /> 5) A total of four grab groundwater samples were collected one in the footprint area and three <br /> from perimeter locations. Relatively low concentrations of TPH-G (0.053 and 0.21 mg/1) <br /> 'l was detected in two groundwater samples. Benzene was detected from GI at a concentration <br /> I of 0.80 µg/1 and toluene was detected at 1.3 µg/1. Total xylenes were detected in the <br /> groundwater sample colleted from G1 at a concentration of 1.69 µg/1. TPH-G was the only <br /> 'r requested analyte detected in groundwater from the perimeter pushprobes, at location .G2. <br /> 1 The levels detected at the depths and locations in groundwater at the site are below State and <br /> Federal MCLs for drinking water. The extent and distribution of hydrocarbon in groundwater <br /> r{I is unknown at this time. It is Kleinfelder's opinion that the potential exists that the detections <br /> in groundwater may be a result of cross-contamination especially at location GI. The <br /> possibility of cross contamination was discussed during workplan preparation with the <br /> various parties involved [Chevron representatives (Cambria Environmental) and Kagehiro <br /> Ranch, hie. (Curtis and Arata Attorney's and Geocon Environmental)]. <br /> 6) Kleinfelder at this time does not recommend clean-up or additional groundwater monitoring <br /> activities related to petroleum constituents detected in groundwater, based on the relatively <br /> low levels detected and since applicable petroleum constituents are below drinking water <br /> standards (MCLs). If additional information is desired related to groundwater to assess <br /> potential risk, Kleinfelder recommends either installation of temporary or permanent <br /> groundwater wells to confirm the accuracy of the grab groundwater sampling results. <br /> 7) Kleinfelder recommends submitting a workplan to SJC/EHD detailing proposed remedial <br /> activities, potential profile soil sampling and analyses for disposal purposes and a <br /> confirmation soil sampling plan. <br /> 8) Kleinfelder recommends this report be submitted to San Joaquin County Public Health <br /> Services Department Environmental Health Division (SJC/EHD) for review and comment. <br /> This report, and the conclusions and recommendations presented in this Executive Summary, are <br /> subject to the "Limitations"presented in Chapter 7 of this report. Any other party(other than the <br /> Pegasus MH Ventures I), or regulatory agencies having enforcement jurisdiction for this site) <br />;J who would like to use this report shall notify Kleinfelder, Inc. of such intended use in writing for <br /> permission. <br />��. 44843.T03/ST04RIO25 <br /> Copyright 2004 Kleinfelder,Inc. page 14 of 16 <br /> 91 <br /> August 6,2004 <br />