My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST
>
3230
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544759
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2019 11:01:47 AM
Creation date
8/19/2019 10:03:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544759
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004058
FACILITY_NAME
VANCO*
STREET_NUMBER
3230
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WEST
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
11708017
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3230 N WEST LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE 1 - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: Pacific Pride, 3230 West Lane,Stockton, San Joaquin County(#390351) <br /> yF 1. Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, industry and 16 wells within 2,000 feet. 3—municipal and <br /> other uses within 2000 feet of the site; 13 supply(domestic and irrigation). Based <br /> on monitoring data, none threatened. <br /> 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of former and existing tank systems, In reports. <br /> excavation contours and sample locations, boring and monitoring well elevation contours, <br /> gradients, and nearby surface waters, buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities; <br /> 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system diagrams; In reports. <br /> 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal(quantity); All removed and properly disposed of. <br /> © 5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; All site monitoring wells will be destroyed following Regional Board closure <br /> concurrence. <br /> 6. Tabulated results of all groundwater elevations and depths to water; In reports. <br /> © 7. Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: In reports. <br /> Detection limits for confirmation sampling <br /> ❑ Lead analyses <br /> Y <br /> 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil Found in reports. Minimal residual <br /> and groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: concentrations remain and pose no threat to <br /> Lateral and Vertical extent of soil contamination groundwater or building inhabitants or <br /> ElY❑ construction workers. <br /> 0 Lateral and Vertical extent of groundwater contamination <br /> 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface Source removal (UST's) and monitoring <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and natural attenuation adequate to protect water <br /> groundwater remediation system; quality goals and human health. <br /> ©10.Reports/information ❑ Unauthorized Release Form © QMRs(Dates) 4/07 through 1/09 <br /> Y <br /> 0 Well and boring logs 0 PAR [V--j FRP a Other. Closure Request and Closure Summary <br /> F]11.Best Available Technology(BAT)used Oran explanation for not using BAT,' UST removal and monitoring. <br /> ©12.Reasons why background was/is unattainable using BAT, Achieved. <br /> 013.Mass balance calculation of substance treated versus that remaining; Due to minimal residual in soil and all NDS in <br /> groundwater, no remaining mass calculated. <br /> 14.Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in risk In reports. <br /> 0 assessments, and fate and transport modeling; <br /> 15.Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely Remaining minimal subsurface contamination will not <br /> impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses;and degrade groundwater beneficial uses or threaten human <br /> health and safety. <br /> 16.WET or TCLP results <br /> NA <br /> By: ,JIM Comments: The residual contamination remaining from the release does not pose a threat to sensitive receptors in <br /> the area, current groundwater beneficial uses, or threaten human health and safety. No further action is warranted <br /> Date: 10/5/09 for this site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.