COMPLIANCE INFO 2010 - 2013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Nov 04 10 07:33a Elite -V Contactors 120946"z342 p.3 D. Results of Testing/Servicing Software Version Installed: Cnmolptp the fnlinwinn nhartrriet- 0 NIA Yes ❑ No' For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring. system ❑ N/A detects a leak, fails to operate. or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) V Sumprrrench Sensors; 'R Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? Yes; ❑ No- n Yes C No' For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no mechanical overfill prevention /y�' N/A valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm tri qer? % ❑ Yes' No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement pars in Section E, below, Yes- ❑ No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) C Product; J Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. Yes ❑ No' Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable Yes U No' is alt monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? 11 ' In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected E. Comments: 72 �3%U Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4 12/07 2/21/07 No' Is the audible alarm operational? No' Is the visual alarm operational? 99yes ❑ No' Wereall sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? ❑ No' 7 No' Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their roper oDeration? If alarms are rplavpd to a remote mon8nrinn staticn ;c nn , roe; ns a im oro re . ..,4-1 �: o 0 NIA Yes ❑ No' For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring. system ❑ N/A detects a leak, fails to operate. or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) V Sumprrrench Sensors; 'R Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? Yes; ❑ No- n Yes C No' For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no mechanical overfill prevention /y�' N/A valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm tri qer? % ❑ Yes' No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement pars in Section E, below, Yes- ❑ No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) C Product; J Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. Yes ❑ No' Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable Yes U No' is alt monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? 11 ' In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected E. Comments: 72 �3%U Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4 12/07 2/21/07