Laserfiche WebLink
. ham' zc� <br /> AIII <br /> placed in labeled 55 gallon 17H drums and stored on site for lr::.er <br /> disposition. <br /> Concurrent with the boring and sampling operations, soil samples <br /> and drilling spoils were monitored using a hard held Photo <br /> Ionizing Detector (PID) to identify the presence of Total Volatile <br /> Organics (TVO) . The results of the PID readings are presented in <br /> the PPM TVO VAPOR column of the Bore Hole Log. The PID was <br /> calibrated daily using a 25 ppm gasoline vapor standard. Based <br /> upon these TVO vapor readings selected soil samples (highest <br /> readings) were hand delivered to a State Certified Laboratory <br /> (McLaren Analytical Laboratories) via the proper Chain of Custody <br /> procedures for chemical analyses. Also, soil samples collected at <br /> each interval were tested for sieve, dilatancy, moiature, <br /> permeability and plasticity properties using ASTM D2486-84 field <br /> analysis procedures. <br /> Upon completion of drilling and sampling, the boring was converted <br /> to a permanent monitor well. well construction for each well <br /> consisted of 1) installing sterilized 4" Poly-Vinyl Chloride (PVC) <br /> casing; 2) filling the annulus with clean #3 Monterey sand and <br /> bentonite pellets; 3) back-filling with neat cement; and 4) <br /> securing a water tight traffic box over the well. For specific <br /> sand, pellet, and cement intervals see WEGE Monitor Well <br /> Construction Log attatched to this report (APPENDIX A) . San <br /> Joaquin County Environmental Health Division personnel were present <br /> during the cementing process for each well. <br /> Upon well construction completion all drilling eqil:pment (augers, <br /> bit, samplers, etc. ) were sterilized by steam cleaning. A Baker <br /> Poly tank located within the secured treatment compound, was used <br /> for containment of the rinsate. <br /> 2.3 MONITOR NEU DRVELOPHXh <br /> Well development for MW-2 and NW-4-10 commenced on April 11, 1989. <br /> MW-1 and MW-3 were not developed due to the presence of gasoline. <br /> product floating on top of the water. In order to develop each <br /> well, an electrical 4" diameter submersible pump was lowered down <br /> the well and into the water. Water was pumped from each well <br /> until pH, conductivity, and temperature parameters stabilized <br /> (approximately 40 to 50 gallons). Water that was removed from <br /> each well for development purposes was contained within the Baker <br /> Poly Tank. After development each well was allowed to stabilize <br /> for 48 hours before collecting the samples for the certified <br /> laboratory. <br /> A water sample collected from the Baker tank was analyzed for TPH <br /> & BTEX using EPA Methods 8015 and 602 respectively. After <br /> reviewing the chemical results from the tank samples, Glen D. <br /> Birdzell (Deputy Director of Municipal Utilities/Wastewater) on <br /> May 31, 1989, granted permission to discharge this water to the <br /> sewer system,see APPENDIX C. <br />