My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006319
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6425
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0519189
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0006319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2019 4:10:03 PM
Creation date
8/21/2019 2:26:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006319
RECORD_ID
PR0519189
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0014347
FACILITY_NAME
CURRENTLY VACANT
STREET_NUMBER
6425
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09741031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6425 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11940 2 gallons) and venting of MW8 (1 88 pounds/6 25 = 0 . 3 <br /> gallons) No chlorinated solvents were detected in chromatogram <br /> comparisons of the vapor (air) samples , "i e " 1, 2, - <br /> Dichloroethene (DCE) - retention time 2 079 minutes, <br /> Trichloroethylene (TCE) - retention time 3 023 minutes and <br /> Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) - retention time 3 75 minutes . <br /> In the past, water samples from MW1 and MW6 were tested using EPA <br /> method 8240 and were below detection limits for these compounds, <br /> see Update Status Report 21, September, 1993 . Water samples <br /> obtained on March 4 , 1994 from MW1, MW6, MW9 and MW11 were tested <br /> using EPA Method 8010 and were below detection limits for these <br /> compounds Water and vapor samples obtained from MW1, MW6 and <br /> MW9 on April 19, 1995 , were tested using EPA Metod 8260 All <br /> priority compounds were below detection limits <br /> WEGE is also evaluating the need to change out BACT from Thermal <br /> Oxidation to Carbon Adsorbtion, in light of the lower amount of <br /> hydrocarbons found in the vapor stream and the cost savings of <br /> utilities, versus carbon change-out . This tentative modification <br /> to the BACT was approved by San Joaquin Valley Unified Air <br /> Pollution Control District on May 3 , 1995 <br /> TIME FRAME <br /> November, 1995 Ground water gauging and vapor <br /> extraction system air monitoring. <br /> HEALTH AND SAFETY <br /> This site is being treated as a class D site, normal common sense <br /> is to be used <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusion and recommendations presented in this report are <br /> based upon the following <br /> A Tne exploratory test borings drilled at the site <br /> B The Bouwer and Rice Slug test <br /> C The Vapor Extraction Source Test <br /> D The observations of field personnel <br /> E. The results of laboratory analysis performed by a State <br /> certified laboratory <br /> E Referenced documents <br /> F. Specifications supplied by "REMOX" for the Authority to <br /> Construct Permit <br /> G Our understanding of the regulations of the State of <br /> California, San Joaquin County and City of Stockton <br /> PAGE 6 R603 UPDATE-41 10/24/95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.