Laserfiche WebLink
. Page 1 of 1 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: John Lynch [lynch@inreach.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:50 AM <br /> To: Dennis Cox, Gary Cox; Janice Brown <br /> Cc: Jeff Downs; Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: 595 E. 11th Street, Project Update and Request for Direction <br /> Importance: High <br /> As of Friday February 27,there has been 402.33 tons of contaminated soil removed and transported to <br /> Forward landfill from the immediate vicinity of MW-9 southward towards the gas main by the old <br /> welding shop. We have not yet exceeded the budget amount due to production levels being a little <br /> higher than anticipated, in spite of the weather we have encountered. <br /> When preparing the budget for the Interim Remedial Action Plan(IRAP) we anticipated removing no <br /> more than 300-tons total of contaminated soil from the areas around MW-9 and MW-3 based upon <br /> geologic cross sections prepared from soil borings drilled and laboratory data collected for both areas. <br /> More contaminated soil that what was anticipated will be encountered as we move southward towards <br /> MW-3 and the back of the former gas station area where the tanks were located. We have observed that <br /> the contaminated soil is presenting a deeper and wider cross section than discovered in the areas soil <br /> borings were placed. This accounts for the increased quantity of contaminated soil. <br /> Continuing with the IRAP and removing the contaminated soil from the area of MW-3 is appropriate <br /> and will accomplish the essence of a directive issued some time ago that essentially required the <br /> responsible party to reduce source concentrations when free product was discovered in MW-3 and MW- <br /> 9. However, Wright will need two things by Tuesday at close of business: <br /> 1.) A directive from Mr. Infurna at EHD to continue the IRAP work and therefore his approval to <br /> extend the approval of the proposed IRAP to include the increased quantity of soil encountered <br /> that differs from what was included in the IRAP. <br /> 2.) An authorization(change order)from the responsible party to proceed as we will exceed the <br /> budget and amount authorized by the last work authorization. <br /> Absent an authorization to proceed from the Cox Cox Partnership and a directive from EHD Wright will <br /> then suspend IRAP work, secure the site (backfill and grade) and complete the treatment of what water <br /> is on site and get the Baker Tank removed. By stopping work on Wednesday and shifting focus to <br /> securing the site we may exceed the budget amount forecast when the IRAP work was authorized. <br /> I will be available all day today to answer any questions you may have. <br /> John Lynch <br /> 209-833-0758 office <br /> 209-603-3394 cell ���/ �'f/ pmayc, <br /> // W1Z:76r .- <br /> 3/1/2004 <br />