Laserfiche WebLink
Robert Burick <br /> Page 3 <br /> the contaminants in the groundwater. As additional wells are <br /> added to define the groundwater plume, a request can be made to <br /> sample less frequently those wells that provide similar <br /> information or information that may be inferred from nearby <br /> wells. Regardless of the sampling frequency, a status report <br /> must be submitted to PHS/EHD on a quarterly basis. <br /> As the additional information from the soil and groundwater <br /> analytical data is gathered, at least two active remedial <br /> alternatives should be considered for this site. Any testing <br /> needed to determine the feasibility of these alternatives should <br /> be scheduled during the plume assessment phase. This data is <br /> necessary to justify the remedial options that are eventually <br /> chosen for inclusion in the final Corrective Action Plan (CAP) . <br /> Once the assessment phase is completed and the physical extent of <br /> the contamination is identified, the information is presented in <br /> the CAP. The CAP will discuss the two active remediation <br /> alternatives established as feasible for this site. The CAP can <br /> also present the passive biodegradation alternative. However, <br /> the site specific concerns mentioned above may not allow this <br /> alternative to be an option for this site. The most efficient, <br /> cost effective remediation alternative identified should be <br /> chosen to remediate the site. <br /> If you have any questions or would like to discuss this letter in <br /> more detail, please contact Linda Turkatte, REHS, of my staff at <br /> (209) 468-0339. <br /> Jogi Khann M.D. , M.P.H. <br /> Health O i r <br /> Laurie A. Cotulla, RENS, Program Manager <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> i <br /> / LAC/lt <br /> c: Beth Thayer-CVRWQCB <br /> c: Otto Williford <br /> c: Alice Plumlee <br /> c: Donald and Joyce Bianchi <br /> c: Ray Kablanow-Geological Technics, Inc. <br />