My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010228
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELEVENTH
>
1615
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544799
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 10:19:05 AM
Creation date
9/3/2019 3:29:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010228
RECORD_ID
PR0544799
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003872
FACILITY_NAME
DISCOVERY CHEVROLET
STREET_NUMBER
1615
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELEVENTH
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
23227019
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1615 W ELEVENTH ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HLALTH SERVICES a��N <br /> P <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br /> Karen Furst, M.D., M.P.H., Health Officer - - �- <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor • Stockton, CA 952021, 4.�•�o` a� <br /> • r <br /> 2091468-3420 <br /> THOMAS J NOKES <br /> SEP 0 2 1997 <br /> 1650 PARK ST <br /> ALAMEDA CA 94501 <br /> RE: DISCOVERY CHEVROLET SITE CODE: 2595 <br /> 1615 WEST 11TH STREET <br /> TRACY CA 95376 <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHSIEHD) has <br /> recently reviewed the June 6, 1997"Report of Additional Subsurface Investigation" prepared by <br /> Horizon Environmental and the July 7, 1997"Second Quarter 1997 Status Report" prepared by <br /> GeoStrategies Inc. for the above referenced site. <br /> The June report summarizes the results of a workplan implemented on April 3, 1997, to comply <br /> with the recommendations in the PHSIEHD correspondence of September 9, 1996. In this letter <br /> PHSIEHD requested a complete soil and groundwater assessment of contamination at the site. <br /> The required data was to include the lateral and vertical extent of soil contamination in the former <br /> common tank location, the downgradient extent of the groundwater plume, an evaluation of natural <br /> attenuation and a well survey. <br /> Hand auger borings were used to define the extent of soil contamination around the former tank pit. <br /> The boring logs from the hand augered borings were not included in the report. The hand augered <br /> borings were unable to identify the lateral or vertical extent of soil contamination to the west. The <br /> lateral extent of soil contamination east of thebrmer tank pit appears to have been identified. <br /> None of the hand augered samples were able to identify the vertical extent of the contamination. <br /> During the September 10, 1994, installation of monitoring well 1 soil samples were taken from 6.5', <br /> 10.5', 15' and 20' below ground surface(bgs). Only the 10.5' sample was submitted for analysis. <br /> The Photo Ionization Detector(PID) reading from this sample was 1149 ppm. The analytical results <br /> of this sample confirmed the presence of gasoline.contamination. PID readings from the 15' and <br /> the 20' sample were 356 ppm and 449 ppm respectively. MW-1 was installed near the dispenser <br /> lines. The vertical extent of contamination in this area has not been defined. r -- <br /> The September 10, 1994, boring log for MW-2 recorded the PID readings as 1281 ppm at 10.5', <br /> 11.5 ppm at 15', 1.3 ppm at 17.5' and 2.4 ppm at 20'. Although only the 10'sample was analyzed, <br /> based on the PID readings, gross contamination does not appear to extend beyond 15 feet on the <br /> north side of the former tank excavation. <br /> Laboratory analyses of samples obtained from the hand augered borings combined with the <br /> monitoring well data implicate the f r dis eraser and line as a source of contamination. <br /> Obtaining soil data from beneath the former dispenser and lines is necessary to determine the size <br /> of the soil plume. The size of the soil plume is necessary to determine the probability of <br /> groundwater impact and to determine the feasibility of various cleanup options. It may be <br /> necessary to obtain samples from soil deeper than static water to define the vertical extent of soil <br /> contamination in this area. Since gradient is north west additional monitoring wells may be <br /> necessary north west of the building to monitor the groundwater plume that would have resulted f <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Health Care Services <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.