Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.A-13 ` <br /> Forward Inc.Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> Hazardous Waste Element(HHWE), a Nondisposal Facility Element(NDFE), and a Siting <br /> Element. The Siting Element specifies the location of solid waste disposal and transformation — <br /> facilities needed to provide capacity for the implementation of the CIWMP. The Siting Element <br /> also requires identification of future projects including expansions of existing sites. (Reno, <br /> 2009). The Siting Element of the San Joaquin County CIWMP,April 1996, identifies the existing _ <br /> Forward Landfill, and the former Austin Road Sanitary Landfill, as designated disposal <br /> facilities. As required by AB 939, the Siting Element of the CIWMP also presents remaining <br /> disposal capacity for the 15-year planning period beginning in January 1995. The discussion of <br /> remaining capacity includes the two then-existing landfills (the original Forward Landfill and <br /> the former Austin Road Sanitary Landfill) and the Austin Road Sanitary Landfill expansion. <br /> Based on landfills active at that time, including the then-existing Austin Road and original <br /> Forward Landfills, the North County Recycling Center and Sanitary Landfill, and the Foothill <br /> Sanitary Landfill, San Joaquin County had disposal capacity sufficient to last until the year 2041. <br /> This is substantially more than 15 years of capacity. <br /> San Joaquin County has local regulatory and monitoring responsibilities for the existing <br /> Forward Landfill, under Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations. These are fulfilled by <br /> the County Department of Public Works, Solid Waste Division. The role of Local Enforcement <br /> Agency (LEA) for the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery(CalRecycle)is fulfilled <br /> by the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department. <br /> The San Joaquin County Planning Commission has authority to approve project plans and --� <br /> specifications. Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the Board of <br /> Supervisors. <br /> Agricultural Land v <br /> The currently proposed new landfill areas (approximately 11 acres in the southeast of the <br /> existing landfill and approximately 10 acres in the northeast of the existing landfill) are not <br /> currently in agricultural use and are not considered Prime agricultural land, as defined by the <br /> State of California (Government Code Section 51201). <br /> Prime agricultural land in the project vicinity is shown in Figure IV.A-3. Prime agricultural <br /> land is defined by Government Code Section 51201 as any of the following: <br /> • Land qualifying for a Storie Index rating of 80-100; <br /> • Land qualifying for a Natural Resource Conservation Service land use capability Class I <br /> or Class II rating; <br /> • Grazing land capable of supporting at least one animal unit per acre; <br /> • Agricultural land that has returned at least$200/acre for three of the past five years, or <br /> will normally return at least$200/acre. <br /> The expansion area in the southeast of the existing landfill consists of creek channel and existing <br /> permitted landfill operations(including the composting facility), does not provide viable <br /> grazing land because of its small size and isolation from other grazing land, and has not been <br /> used for agriculture for many years. The approximately 10 acres in the northeast of the existing <br /> landfill is classified as Urban on the Prime Agricultural Land and Important Farmland Map, <br /> and is not viable as grazing land because of its small size and isolation from other grazing land, <br /> and has not been used for agriculture for many years. <br />