Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.A-22 <br /> Forward Inc.Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> expansion would comply with the ROC also applies to the south portion of the 2014 Expansion <br /> Project. <br /> The northeast portion of the 2014 Expansion Project site is located outside of the localizer <br /> taw approach area,but is within the conical imaginary surface defined in FAR 77.19. Under FAR <br /> 77.19, the horizontal imaginary surface extends 10,000 feet from a point 200 feet beyond the end <br /> of the nearest runway, and is 150 feet above the published airport elevation (33 feet at Stockton), <br /> or 183 feet msl. The conical imaginary surface extends upward from the horizontal surface at <br /> 20:1 for an additional 4,000 feet. Thus,obstructions greater than a height of 183 feet msl would <br /> exceed the horizontal imaginary surface limits for the Stockton Metropolitan Airport. Outside <br /> the 10,000-foot limit of the horizontal surface, obstructions into the conical imaginary surface <br /> that slopes upward from an elevation of 183 feet msl would exceed the conical imaginary <br /> surface limits. This portion of the 2014 Expansion Project has a maximum height of 200 feet,but <br /> has a slope that does not penetrate into the conical imaginary surface. <br /> In summary, the proposed final grades of the 2014 Expansion Project would not exceed the <br /> obstacle clearance height of the localizer runway 29R instrument approach, and would not <br /> encroach into the Stockton Municipal Airport imaginary surfaces. (Dershowitz,2011). <br /> Therefore, the final grades of the proposed expansion project would have a less-than- <br /> significant impact on safety due to conflict with FAR height limits or the airport imaginary <br /> space. <br /> However,when the two expansion areas have been filled to an elevation near their permitted <br /> heights, equipment operating on top of the landfill could temporarily intrude into the conical <br /> �., space. Forward would continue its procedure of submitting a Notice of Proposed Construction <br /> or Alteration(FAA Form 7460-1) at least 45 days prior to operation of any equipment that could <br /> temporarily intrude into the imaginary surface, as required by the Federal Aviation <br /> L. Administration (FAA)for all proposed construction or alterations that could intrude into the <br /> airport imaginary surface. This would reduce the impact of operating equipment on the conical <br /> space to a less-than-significant level. <br /> �- The impact of the 2014 Expansion Project on FAA height limits would be less than significant <br /> and no mitigation is required. <br /> Impact AA: The proposed project could increase bird hazards at the Stockton Metropolitan <br /> Airport(Revises 2013 EIR Impact A.Q. As discussed in Bird Strikes,in the Setting section <br /> above, the existing landfill has not generated significant bird strike hazards for the Stockton <br /> ` Metropolitan Airport in the past from gulls or other bird species, and a bird control program <br /> has been successful in controlling birds at the landfill. The currently proposed Project would <br /> continue to employ current bird control measures including properly compacting and covering <br /> wastes at the end of each day, and use of falcons,bird flares, whistles, and bombs. The <br /> +� maximum elevation of the expansion area would be approximately 200 feet above mean sea <br /> level(MSL), lower than the permitted maximum height of 210 feet MSL for the existing <br /> Forward Landfill. As discussed above, the proposed expansion would not conflict with FAR <br /> height limits. However,both portions of the 2014 Expansion Project would have higher <br /> surfaces that could increase the hovering altitude of any birds attracted to the landfill, and thus <br /> could create a hazard to aircraft. <br /> The following procedures are proposed as part of the project: <br /> • Existing measures to discourage birds from the landfill will be continued. Surface area <br /> i of ponds will be limited to the extent feasible. <br />