Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.B-28 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> L <br /> Intersection Operations—Year 2035 Conditions Without the Proposed Project <br /> Intersection operations during the AM and PM peak hours at the study intersections without <br /> the project in year 2035 were analyzed in the 2013 EIR,because the previously proposed project <br /> would have generated traffic until 2039. This scenario assumes that driveway traffic volume at <br /> L the landfill remains as existing,with 212 truck loads per day and 35 employees. Peak hour <br /> traffic volumes that would occur at these intersections are shown in Figure IV.B-7, and levels of <br /> service are presented in Table IV.B-11. <br /> Under cumulative (no project) conditions in year 2035, all LOS values would be worse than <br /> Existing conditions with a number of locations operating at LOS F, summarized as follows: <br /> • Austin Road/Arch Road: LOS Fin the PM Peak <br /> :. • Route 99 at French Camp Road northbound ramp: LOS F in the AM and PM peaks <br /> • Route 99 at Arch Road: LOS F in the AM and PM peaks <br /> • Route 99 at Mariposa Road south bound ramp: LOS F in the AM and PM peaks <br /> Year 2035 Intersection Operations Deficiencies <br /> Traffic levels associated with cumulative development in year 2035 without the proposed <br /> project would cause the intersections identified above to operate at an unacceptable LOS F <br /> during one or both PM peak hours. In the Mariposa Lakes traffic study cited above, the poor <br /> performance of these intersections is attributed to an extremely high volume of traffic, and these <br /> i.. impacts are identified as Significant and Unavoidable. <br /> Year 2035 Cumulative-Plus-Project Traffic Volumes <br /> As discussed in Chapter III, Project Description, the 2014 Expansion Project at the Forward <br /> Landfill is projected to cease operations in year 2031. Thus, the 2014 Expansion Project would <br /> generate no traffic in the 2035 cumulative horizon year. Unlike the previously proposed project, <br /> the 2014 Expansion Project would not change the Year 2035 Conditions Without the Proposed <br /> Project shown in Figure IV.B-7 and Table IV.B-11. <br /> ,. Traffic volumes in the cumulative year 2035 would include traffic generated by development <br /> that occurs between the present time and 2035. Although the timing of this development <br /> cannot be predicted, it is likely that at least some of the development anticipated to exist in 2035 <br /> would have occurred by 2031, the last year of operation of the 2014 Expansion Project. In the <br /> ` years up to and including 2031, the 2014 Expansion Project traffic,which would generate the <br /> same volume of traffic as the previously proposed project evaluated in the 2013 EIR, would <br /> combine with other traffic to affect operation of local roads and intersections in those years. <br /> Because cumulative traffic in the years up to 2031 would be no greater than, and may be less <br /> than, traffic levels in 2035,the contribution of the 2014 Expansion Project to cumulative impacts <br /> in the years up to 2031 also would be equal to or less than the year 2035 cumulative impacts <br /> L evaluated in the 2013 EIR, as discussed below. Thus,the effect of the project in year 2035 <br /> cumulative conditions evaluated in the 2013 EIR is a worst-case measure of the effect of the 2014 <br /> Expansion Project in 2031. <br /> ` The year 2035 AM and PM peak-hour traffic volumes at the study intersections from the 2013 <br /> EIR are shown in Figure IV.B-8, and levels of service that would occur at these intersections and <br /> the project driveway are presented in Table IV.B-12. Traffic volumes and levels of service at <br /> i- these intersections resulting in 2031, including the contribution of the 2014 Expansion Project, <br /> would be the same as, or better than,those shown in IV.B-8 and Table IV.B-12. <br />