My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0800105
>
SU0007861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 11:37:03 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:03:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007861
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0800105
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
APN
20106003
ENTERED_DATE
8/11/2009 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/24/2009 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\EIR PA-0800105\NOP.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
687
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.F-6 <br /> Forward Inc.Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> other special-status plant species are considered to have any potential to occur within the study <br /> area. <br /> Special-Status Animals <br /> Special-status animal species include those listed as endangered, threatened, rare, or as <br /> candidates for listing by the USFWS (2014) and/or CDFW (2014b). Other species regarded as <br /> having special status include "special animals", as listed by the CDFG (2011a). "Special <br /> i" animals" is a general term that refers to all of the taxa the CNDDB is interested in tracking, <br /> regardless of their legal or protection status.The California Department of Fish and Wildlife <br /> t (formerly the Department of Fish and Game)(CDFW) considers the taxa on this list to be those <br /> of greatest conservation need. Additional animal species receive protection under the Bald <br /> Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act(MBTA)4. The State of California <br /> created the classification of"Fully Protected" conserve wildlife species that risk extinction <br /> within the State. <br /> Administered by the CDFW, lists of fully protected species were created for fish', mammals', <br /> birds', and reptiles and amphibians'. Additional information on Fully Protected fish can be <br /> found in the California Code of Regulations (CCR)'. The category of Protected Amphibians and <br /> Reptiles in Title 14 has been repealed. The CCR also provides for the protection of certain <br /> furbearing mammals10. Additional definitions of endangered, rare or threatened species are <br /> �• given in CEQA" <br /> Based on a review of special-status animal species recorded in the project region (CNDDB 2012, <br /> yb, 2014, SJCOG 2000;USFWS 2012, 2014), a total of 58 special-status animal species were evaluated <br /> for their potential for occurrence. Based on habitats present in the study area and the context of <br /> the project site,five federally and/or State-listed animal species could potentially occur on site. <br /> In addition, 19 non-listed special-status species have been recorded from the project region <br /> (Table IV.H-1). Below is a discussion of those species that may occur on the site (and be <br /> potentially impacted by the project) or whose occurrence on site is not expected but are <br /> prominent in today's regulatory environment. <br /> Several special-status species that occur in the region have some likelihood to occur within the <br /> study area however the majority of the site is disked and devoid of vegetation, or activity used <br /> for landfill operations. <br /> Site reconnaissance visits conducted in 2005,2008, 2012, and 2014 are not considered sufficient <br /> to confirm presence or absence of special-status wildlife because they were not USFWS <br /> protocol-level surveys. Therefore, the potential for occurrence on site was assessed by presence <br /> or absence of appropriate habitat and geographic distribution. <br /> 416 USC§703-711;50 CFR Subchapter B <br /> '§5515 <br /> 6§4700 <br /> 'CFGC§3511 <br /> 0 8§5050 <br /> L, 9 CCR,Title 14,Division 1,Subdivision 1,Chapter 2,Article 4,§5.93 <br /> io CCR,Title 14,Division 1,Subdivision 2,Chapter 5,§460 <br /> 11§15380(d) <br /> Q <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.