Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page V-3 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2014 Expansion Project <br /> the lowest impact,because it would not result in creek relocation impacts and would not <br /> j' affect the visual quality of the Southern parcel as viewed from Austin Road. <br /> r It should be noted that the Forward Inc. landfill is the only landfill in San Joaquin <br /> County that accepts Class II wastes, and under Alternatives 4 and 5, those wastes would <br /> need to be disposed of at out-of-county landfills upon the closure of the Forward <br /> Landfill earlier than under the proposed project or Alternative 6. This could result in <br /> r� greater regional air pollutant emissions than with the project,as well as unknown <br /> impacts of expanding landfills elsewhere. Because Alternative 4 would not affect the <br /> composting facility or require creek realignment,it is considered the environmentally <br /> superior alternative. However, long-term benefits of the restored creek and additional <br /> Class 2 landfill capacity would not be gained under that alternative. <br />