My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0800105
>
SU0007861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 11:37:03 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:03:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007861
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0800105
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
APN
20106003
ENTERED_DATE
8/11/2009 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/24/2009 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\EIR PA-0800105\NOP.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
687
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bird Control Program Forward Landfill—Manteca, California _ <br /> Gull Behavior at Night <br /> Gulls spend the night at communal roosts on large bodies of water where they occur in <br /> dense flocks. The use of the night roosts is traditional with particular roosts being used year after _ <br /> year. Gulls do not feed at inland terrestrial areas at night and they do not feed at landfills at <br /> night. The latter fact has been demonstrated at many landfills. The best documented case is the <br /> Atlantic County Utilities Authority where waste is disposed of at night. There has not been a — <br /> single gull seen at that coastal landfill during over 13 years of operation (Davis and Hixon 2011). <br /> Because of this nocturnal behavior, it is not necessary to control gulls at night at the Forward <br /> Landfill. — <br /> History of Bird Strikes at Stockton Metropolitan Airport (SCK) <br /> The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) maintains an extensive data base documenting <br /> wildlife/aircraft collisions at airports throughout the U.S. The FAA data base includes records <br /> beginning in 1990 and contained over 142,603 strike records by the end of 2013. As of 31 _ <br /> December 2013, the data base contained records of 45 bird strikes associated with the Stockton <br /> Airport. It is well known that not all bird strikes are reported but the important strikes (those that <br /> affect flight, cause damage, etc.) are more likely to be reported than are strikes that cause no <br /> damage and often are not even detected by the flight crew. It is apparent that the airport has been <br /> much more diligent in reporting strikes in the past three years with 25 (56%) of the 45 strikes since <br /> 1990 recorded during that three-year period compared to 20 strikes (44%) in the previous 21 year — <br /> period. <br /> A summary printout of the 45 strikes at the Stockton Metropolitan Airport is included as <br /> Table 5. The Forward Landfill has been operating during the entire 24-year period covered by <br /> the FAA data base. For the 20 years before the fall and winter of 2010-2011, there was no bird <br /> control program in place at the landfill. Therefore, if the landfill was attracting birds that were a — <br /> threat to aircraft safety, the strike data from the airport should reflect that risk. Gulls are the <br /> group of birds that are attracted to the landfill and could pose a threat to aircraft using the <br /> Stockton Airport. The 45 reported strikes (Table 5) are examined in the following paragraphs. <br /> Twenty-seven of the strikes involved identified birds that were not gulls. A twenty- <br /> eighth strike involved a gull carcass that was found on the airport on 28 October 2000; it was <br /> assumed to have been struck by an aircraft. Of the 17 strikes that involved unknown birds, 8 <br /> involved small birds that could not have been gulls. Of the 9 remaining strikes, 4 involved <br /> "medium" or "large" unknown birds and 5 involved "unknown bird or bat". In theory, any of <br /> these 9 strikes could have involved gulls. <br /> Two of the four incidents involving birds of unknown size involved military aircraft in _ <br /> June 2006. This is a period when gulls are not present in the Stockton area; thus these two <br /> strikes undoubtedly did not involve gulls. A third strike occurred at night (8 April 2013) when <br /> gulls have returned to the coast. A fourth strike occurred on 8 October 1991 when a military <br /> KC135 struck a bird on its landing roll at SCK. It is possible that the bird may have <br /> LCHM 11 30 December 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.