Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Environmental Impact Report Page IV.B-11 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill Expansion <br /> generated by the proposed project would degrade the LOS of the intersection from an 4 <br /> acceptable LOS (i.e., A, B, C, or D) to an unacceptable LOS (i.e., E or F). If project-generated <br /> traffic exceeds the County's LOS standards, then mitigation measures that would improve the r <br /> LOS to an acceptable level must be identified. If the LOS for conditions at a given location is <br /> already at an unacceptable LOS, then mitigation measures that would return the v/c ratio <br /> (volume/capacity) to the "existing" (without project)level must be identified. <br /> Project Trip Generation <br /> Table IV.13-7 presents trip generation estimates for trips generated by the proposed project. The I <br /> proposed project would increase the daily trucks from 620 to 960, an increase of 340 trucks and <br /> 680 truck trips. <br /> In keeping with a worst case analysis, it was assumed that all new project trips would be truck <br /> trips. LOS calculations for the Existing and Existing Plus Approved Projects scenarios assume <br /> ten percent of the traffic is trucks. Because the proposed project traffic would be nearly all <br /> trucks, the truck percentage was assumed to increase to 20 percent. <br /> I <br /> For a previous transportation study at the site, Forward Inc. collected information on existing <br /> travel associated with the existing Forward Landfill for six days in June 2002:June 11 through <br /> June 13, and June 26 through June 28. The data show the number of inbound vehicles by hour <br /> between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Traffic counts taken at the project driveway indicate that <br /> approximately 10 percent of the landfill's total daily trips occur during the AM peak hour. <br /> Approximately 6 percent of the total daily trips occur during the PM peak hour. The traffic data <br /> collected in February 2009 indicate that the facility was not operating at full capacity during the <br /> counts. Therefore,AM and PM peak hour traffic are estimated by applying the percent of <br /> traffic in each peak hour to the net daily increase. <br /> Table IV.B-7 <br /> PROJECT TRIP GENERATION <br /> Project Trips <br /> Condition Daily Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour <br /> In Out In Out f <br /> Existing 1,240 51 46 14 23 <br /> Proposed 1,920 85 80 35 44 <br /> Net Increase 1 680 1 34 34__L 21 21 <br /> Notes: <br /> 1. The number of Daily Trips is the maximum amount allowed under the existing Land <br /> Use Permit for the Existing Condition and under the proposed permits for the <br /> Proposed Condition. <br /> 2. The percent of trips occurring in the peak hours(10 percent in the AM and 6 percent I <br /> in the PM)is assumed to remain the same in the Proposed Condition. ' <br /> 3. Proposed trips assume a 50/50 In/Out split for new trips. <br /> Trip Distribution <br /> The directional distribution of new project-generated trips through the study intersections is <br /> shown in Figure IV.B-4. The largest portion(45 percent) of project traffic travels on Arch Road <br /> and Route 99. Twenty five percent uses French Camp Road, and 20 percent uses Mariposa <br /> Road. The remaining ten percent uses local roads. <br /> i <br />