Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Environmental Impact Report Page IV.E-6 <br /> P F g <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill Expansion Project <br /> In summary; the maximum estimated expansion risks/hazards (using residential risk <br /> assumption weighting) at the boundary of the landfill are 5.04 x 10"5 and are lowered to 0.15 x <br /> 10'at the downgradient residential receptors. These(10-5)values exceed USEPA's target risk <br /> range but are less than the baseline conditions. Estimates of exposure to onsite receptors were <br /> all protective of the California Occupational Safety and Health administration(OSHA) <br /> permissible exposure limits. <br /> Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> Standards of Significance <br /> For the purposes of this section, impacts and mitigation measures identified in the 2002 <br /> Consolidated Forward Landfill EIR were reviewed and incorporated as appropriate. This <br /> impact section evaluates the currently permitted activities described in the Project Description <br /> that could potentially result in impacts to human health and the environment based on the <br /> conditions of the project area. The proposed project would have a significant impact with <br /> regard to hazardous materials if it would: <br /> Cause an increase in risk above current baseline risk <br /> fit Create a potential public health hazard;or <br /> • Involve the use, production, or disposal of materials that pose a hazard to people or <br /> animal or plant populations in the area affected,beyond baseline conditions. <br /> } + The SJVAPCD CEQA guidelines define a significant risk as one greater than 10 in 1,000,000(10 <br /> "if <br /> toxics best available control technology (T-BACT) is employed. Since T-BACT is met by <br /> current and proposed emission controls,this 10-5 level was used in the HRA as the threshold of <br /> significance for the proposed expansion project. <br /> The 2008 SCS risk assessment established the standard of meeting the requirement of acceptable <br /> risk is to result in no increase in risk above the baseline scenario of the exiting permitted use of <br /> ' the existing Forward/Austin landfill units compared to the proposed expanded plan. Thus, <br /> even if the risk factors are greater than the 10-6 excess cancer risk, or have a hazard index of <br /> greater then 1.0, they may be considered less than significant as long as they do not exceed the <br /> baseline conditions. This criteria is consistent with that used by the County in the 2002 <br /> Consolidated Forward Landfill EIR. <br /> t In addition to overall risk of exposure analyzed in the risk assessment the landfills, expanded <br /> operation must conform to safe practices for its operators and programs to minimize and <br /> appropriately manage hazardous materials. <br /> . Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> Impact E.1: Worker exposure to chemical contaminants and particulates during landfill <br /> operations would exceed levels protective of human health or safety. The project would <br /> increase the amount of potentially contaminated waste products because of the proposed <br /> expansion of the Class II landfill. The current landfill allows for such materials as asbestos and <br /> automobile shredder waste,and a variety of nonhazardous commercial and industrial wastes <br /> including but not limited to sewage sludge;water treatment sludge;grit/grease;holding tank <br /> pumpings;storm drain cleanings;dredge and fill materials;fiberglass;soils contaminated with <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons,metals,non-petroleum-based organics, and/or soluble solids;ash; <br /> infectious waste;metals-contaminated wastes;organic compound contaminated materials; <br /> chemical toilet waste;boiler blowdown water(in dry form only);construction and demolition <br /> waste;processed tires; septic tank pumpings;cleansed pesticide containers;and nonhazardous <br />