Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Environmental Impact Report Page IV.F-10 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill Expansion <br /> The depths to water measured in the borings installed by CDM in 1998 ranged from 61 to 84.6 <br /> feet bgs or-24 to--42 feet msl. Water levels have subsequently dropped with most wells <br /> showing depths to groundwater at about 60 feet bgs in 2008 for the Forward and Austin Road <br /> landfill units. As discussed in the regional hydrology, groundwater flows in the project area are <br /> F,44 <br /> generally to the north, sometimes with a northeast component.Figure IV.F-2 shows the May <br /> 2008 groundwater (elevation) contours,which illustrate the groundwater flow direction,which <br /> is generally northward. <br /> Groundwater gradient (the steepness of the slope of the groundwater flow) varies seasonally, <br /> y being reflective of the weather cycles and pumping, with a steeper, north-trending gradient in <br /> Ffidry years and a more gentle, northeast gradient in wet years (Kleinfelder, 1988; CDM, 1999). <br /> The dry year gradient is apparently affected by greater drawdown in the area northeast of <br /> Stockton. Perched water may occur intermittently during the wet season, above relatively <br /> impermeable silts or clays in the sediment sequence. Hydrogeological data from the Forward <br /> Landfill site indicate that vertical and horizontal transmissivities are highly varied, and there is <br /> substantial interconnection between upper and lower aquifers. The development of a regional <br /> cone of depression east of Stockton, in response to pumping of agricultural and municipal <br /> wells, indicates the connectedness of the regional aquifers. The flow directions and gradients <br /> F are consistent with the groundwater quality results collected during CDM(1999a) and AEE <br /> (2001a and 2001b) investigations. The groundwater gradient, even with its variation,has been <br /> relatively flat and consistent, ranging between 0.001 and 0.002 ftlft between 1991 and 2007 <br /> } (GLA, 2007) <br /> In general, the available information suggests that the primary aquifer under the site is an <br /> unconfined aquifer within the Victor Formation. No widely correlatable shallow aquifer sands, <br /> " y or silt and clay aquicludes or local aquitards (barriers)were reported, which reduces the ability <br /> to predict lateral groundwater flow or vertical interconnections. Groundwater tests associated <br /> with the Forward Landfill site determined that the rate of groundwater flow in the uppermost <br /> regional aquifer was in the range of 0.08 to 0.8 feet per day, which is a relatively high flow rate <br /> (Kleinfelder, 1991). Due to the heterogeneous nature of the Victor Formation sediment units, <br /> aquifer properties,including conductivity and rate of flow, are anticipated to vary by a factor of <br /> F, 10 or greater, depending on location. <br /> The location of the main expansion area upgradient of the Forward Landfill and upgradient <br /> (west) of the Austin Road landfill unit means that, over time, should subsurface contamination <br /> occur the groundwater will flow towards the extraction well points downgradient. <br /> F.1 Groundwater Quality <br /> Site Groundwater Studies <br /> New groundwater and hydrochemical data has been collected and modeled since the <br /> Consolidated Forward Inc. Landfill EIR(2003) was completed. Numerous studies and <br /> groundwater monitoring events have been completed per the RWQCB Order(s)in an effort to <br /> F` track trends and monitoring and mitigate the offsite groundwater plume. <br /> F. <br />