Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Environmental Impact Report Page IV.F-19 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill Expansion <br /> 2008 monitoring data. This significant reduction is likely a result of dilution from infiltrating <br /> clean recharge water into the infiltration basins because the previous modeling studies (EDM, <br /> 2001) showed well MW-11 lies outside of the capture zone of the extraction swells EW-1 and <br /> EW-2. The apparent improvement of the groundwater may be also be the result of a <br /> combination of natural attenuation and plume migration and dispersion. Indicators of the <br /> natural breakdown(dechlorination)of the PCE and TCE to the daughter products DCE and VC <br /> are not apparent in the data. On the other hand concentrations at the wells AMW-13 and <br /> AMW14 further downgradient showed 25 ug/L and 18 gg/L PCE, respectively. <br /> Leachate Generation, Treatment, and Monitoring <br /> Leachate monitoring is a requirement of the landfill operation as described in the Project <br /> description in this report. Initially the landfill attempted to dispose the leachate to the City of <br /> Stockton wastewater treatment plant, but the toxicity of the leachate was prohibitive. The <br /> responsibility for the appropriate storage and treatment of any generated leachate was <br /> transferred to Forward Landfill now implements pumping all leachate generated to leachate <br /> evaporation ponds along with excess drainage not used in landfilling operation). The leachate <br /> impoundment was sized based on actual leachate generation records from 1991 to 1997 and has <br /> a design capacity of approximately 3.5 million gallons, a significantly greater capacity than the <br /> EPA HELP model predictions (JTD,2007 update). <br /> The leachate collection and removal system (LCRS)is summarized in the Project Description. <br /> This LCRS will be utilized in the new proposed landfill expansion phases. The LCRS is the first <br /> line of defense for the protection of groundwater from any leachate generated from the landfill. <br /> The system uses two configurations for the two types of liner gradients to be constructed for the <br /> base and the slopes of the landfill. Three leachate evaporation ponds are planned for the site. <br /> These are designed to be sufficient for the maximum projected leachate generation. An existing <br /> evaporation pond built in 1999, WMU-F North, currently provides containment for leachate <br /> from the active portions of the existing Forward Landfill. A second impoundment, WMU-F <br /> South, is proposed as part of the project to service the southwest region of Forward Landfill <br /> through Phase 10 of the project. Construction of the third evaporation pond along the <br /> southwest border of the existing Austin Road Landfill is proposed to service later buildout <br /> phases. <br /> The leachate liner and collection system are sized to meet the potential leachate generation <br /> predicted by the EPA Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) model. The <br /> HELP model predicted the most significant peak of lubricate generation in the new expansion <br /> areas to be in the fifth year when total annual leachate generation would reach 223,000 gallons <br /> with a daily peak at 2,150 gallons. However, the HELP model results contrast significantly with <br /> the much larger leachate volume projection that are base don the historical leachate production <br /> records form the exiting landfill operations from Y1998 when high rainfall(25 inches) occurred. <br /> In that year 6,210, 350 gallons of annual leachate—or 31, 052 gallons per day, were generated. <br /> Thus the HEMP model may under-predict the leachate generation. <br /> The Austin Road Landfill unit has a leachate collection system built above the unlined Class III <br /> landfill (that had no leachate collection system) as part of its expansion into a Class II facility. <br /> Required leachate monitoring consists of daily inspections of the system and sumps for the <br /> presence of leachate. If leachate is present, the sumps are pumped and the leachate is disposed. <br /> Leachate detected in a previously dry sump is sampled and that sump will be added to the <br /> semi-annual sampling program. The leachate samples are analyzed for the constituents and <br /> parameters listed in the site's WDRs, and include the field parameters discussed in the surface <br />