My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0800105
>
SU0007861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 11:37:03 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:03:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007861
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0800105
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
APN
20106003
ENTERED_DATE
8/11/2009 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/24/2009 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\EIR PA-0800105\NOP.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
687
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Environmental Impac R t a IV.F-25 <br /> Rep ort Page <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill Expansion <br /> differential settlement. The landfill design attempts to mitigate this by placing daily soil cover <br /> over the refuse. The potential for differential settlement affecting the landfill leachate collection <br /> system is limited to the Austin Road portion of the combined landfill where the new leachate <br /> collection system is to be placed on top of the existing landfill. Differential settlement could <br /> damage the liner and/or leachate collection system and affect water quality. <br /> The following measures are proposed as part of the project, as described in the Project <br /> Description: <br /> • A settlement analyses was performed to evaluate how landfill grades could change in <br /> the future as refuse materials biodegrade and consolidate. <br /> • Maximum pre-loaded settlement of the combined landfill is projected to provide the <br /> maximum period for settlement, and take advantage of anticipated improvements in <br /> geosynthetic technology. <br /> • Future design for the vertical expansion will, if necessary, include additional <br /> components in the liner system, depending on future differential settlement on the liner <br /> system. <br /> • The appropriate responsible agencies,the CIWMB and RWQCB, shall conduct a review <br /> of the liner and leachate collection system for the vertical expansion over the existing <br /> landfill(s) proposed in the upcoming JTD update. <br /> This has for the most part been constructed. The design for the last part of it was approved this <br /> may and will be constructed this summer. <br /> Implementation of these procedures would reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. <br /> Mitigation Measure F.5: None required. <br /> Impact F.6: A VOC-contaminated plume extending northeast from the northern edge of the <br /> landfill border could affect water quality in offsite private water supply wells. <br /> The extent of the groundwater plume associated with the landfill was underestimated in <br /> previous studies. This was documented in the 1994 Austin Road EIR, as updated in 2002 Austin <br /> Road Expansion EIR and the review of more current data and corrective action assessments. <br /> The water quality data show the contaminant plume associated with the area north of Austin <br /> Road Landfill unit to extend north to the NCYCC wells as already described. The recent <br /> RWQCB Order 2008-0714 addresses the need for further articulation of remedial action to <br /> remedy the offsite plume. The VOC-contaminated plume extends from the northern edge of the <br /> landfill border,to approximately 5,500 feet north/northeast(downgradient)of the Austin Road <br /> unit. The plume is thought to take more of a northerly direction near its leading edge. <br /> Concentrations in some key downgradient monitoring wells, such as MW-11, has demonstrated <br /> the existing system is very effective in reducing the VOC in the border area where the extraction <br /> wells are most effective (see Table IV-F1). Further northward of the infiltration basin the <br /> capture of the plume is more problematic. <br /> The April 1999 CDM report estimates the probable need to extract up to 1,570,000 gpd based on <br /> the extended pumping capture zone model. This compares with actual extraction volumes of <br /> the current system estimated at about 400,000 gpd. The volume of groundwater extracted could <br /> be more that the CDM projections based on the AEE model, depending upon which <br /> combination of remedies are selected. The planned artificial recharge would also have the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.