My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0007861
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0800105
>
SU0007861
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 11:37:03 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:03:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0007861
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0800105
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
APN
20106003
ENTERED_DATE
8/11/2009 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
7/24/2009 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\EIR PA-0800105\NOP.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
687
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report Page IV.F-27 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill Expansion <br /> Within six months, with a financial commitment by Forward, municipal piped water <br /> will be brought to the NCYCC and replace the current us of the supply wells; <br /> • The two private wells will continue to be supplied with bottled water; and <br /> • Because of the potential for contamination from WMU B and/or A of the shallow <br /> groundwater table downgradient and adjacent to the project, existing domestic off-site <br /> wells within 500 feet of the eastern property boundary will be sampled at the same <br /> frequency as the monitoring wells onsite and for the same constituents (see CCR, Title <br /> 27). Final determination of the sampling program and the evaluation of the test results, <br /> along with the appropriate mitigation, is the responsibility of the RWQCB and must be <br /> carried out under their permit authorization, and <br /> • The groundwater capture and remediation system will be augmented to capture the <br /> current offsite plume to the satisfaction of the RWQCB based on their review of the <br /> current Source Control Report before them and other forthcoming reports. <br /> This impact would still be potentially significant. <br /> An additional mitigation measure suggested by the EIR is: <br /> Mitigation Measure F,6: Water quality at the offsite wells, such as the two private wells along <br /> Austin Road and the CYACC wells, shall be monitored quarterly to determine effectiveness of <br /> the new extraction system to be installed, currently being reviewed by the RWQCB. Continued <br /> operation of the augmented groundwater extraction system at the site would help limit the <br /> contaminant plume from expanding further downgradient but would not address the offsite <br /> component potentially beyond the reach of the newly proposed wells, such as the affected <br /> NCYCC wells. The NCYCC and the other offsite private wells would only likely achieve the <br /> WQOs through long-term attenuation and dilution over time. <br /> Implementation of these procedures and mitigation measures would reduce this impact to a <br /> less than significant level. <br /> Impact F.7:Potential decreases in groundwater resources due to loss of recharge surface area <br /> and groundwater pumping. <br /> The proposed landfilling of 185 acres of unpaved agricultural land would remove that land <br /> from rainwater recharge to local aquifers. Concurrently,the increase in landfill capacity over <br /> that currently permitted area would likely result in a greater volume of groundwater extraction. <br /> As discussed in the setting section, groundwater resources in the Central Valley have <br /> historically suffered from overdrafting—where more groundwater is removed than is naturally <br /> recharged into the aquifers. Additional groundwater extraction wells proposed could remove a <br /> potentially significant groundwater volume. This long-term pumping could incrementally <br /> impact local groundwater resources. <br /> A regional groundwater recharge program is apparently being considered by San Joaquin <br /> County Flood Control District for conjunctive use. Such groundwater storage and recharge <br /> programs are designed to store excess water for recharge use during the dry summer months. <br /> Thus introduced recharge would not occur during the seasonal high groundwater of the end of <br /> the wet weather cycle and potentially cause higher than historic groundwater elevations. <br /> The impact from additional groundwater extraction and treatment could be potentially <br /> significant if not mitigated by recharging the groundwater back into the aquifer.The impact <br /> from groundwater recharge would be less than significant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.