Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> Draft Environmental Impact Report Page IV.G-6 <br /> Forward Landfill Expansion <br /> Geologic Conditions <br /> Regional Geology <br /> This discussion of the regional geology of the proposed landfill is based on regional geologic <br /> studies compiled by the California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG, 1982). The landfill <br /> is located near the geographical center of the Great Valley province of California. The Great <br /> Valley separates the Sierra Nevada Range on the east from the Coast Range on the west. It is <br /> structurally an asymmetrical trough filled with a thick sequence of flat-lying accumulated <br /> marine and continental sediments. <br /> The marine sediments of the Great Valley are Cretaceous to Early Tertiary (approximately 35 to <br /> 150 million years before present) deposits of marine clays, silts, and sands that have been <br /> consolidated into sandstones, siltstones, and shale. This sequence is about one mile thick <br /> beneath the site. The marine sediments were deposited during the period when the Sierra <br /> Nevada range was developing and the Pacific plate was being subducted to the west. <br /> Continental sediments in the Great Valley sequence were derived from rocks eroded from the <br /> Sierra Nevada to the east and the newly forming Coast Ranges to the west. At the end of the <br /> Eocene period, the Great Valley around Stockton was uplifted and eventually cut off from the <br /> Pacific Ocean by the accreting Coast Ranges,forming an inland sea area. Sediments from the <br /> eroding Sierra Nevada and Coast Ranges were deposited in the Great Valley by rivers and <br /> streams starting about 35 million years ago. <br /> Site Geology <br /> The geology of the site and site vicinity is based on regional studies augmented by the <br /> numerous exploratory bore and well installation programs completed at the site. The geology <br /> of the landfill has been described in several reports, including Kleinfelder & Associates (1991, <br /> 1997, 1999); CH2M Hill (1992);EMCON (1972); and CDM (1999). A summary of the geologic <br /> setting and associated data is presented in the Joint Technical Document UTD by Bryan Stirrat & <br /> Associates and Geologic Associates (2007) and Geo-Logic Associates (2008). These studies <br /> confirm that the geology as well as the hydrogeology of the landfill area are consistent with <br /> regional conditions. <br /> As determined in exploratory boring and well installation programs performed at the site, <br /> geologic materials beneath the site occur as lenticular units composed of clay, silt, and sand <br /> with minor amounts of gravel. Bedding is typically discontinuous over distance and ranges in <br /> thickness from a few inches to approximately 20 feet. This variability is consistent with <br /> deposition in a fluvial environment where the course of rivers or streams meanders and is <br /> subject to frequent flooding. The sediments observed in borings at the site appear to <br /> correspond with the Pleistocene Victor Formation and can be divided into three large groups t <br /> based on lithology and pervasive distinctions in color. <br /> • Group A.: Surface to approximately 28 to 40 feet below ground - Highly interbedded sandy <br /> silt, clayey silt, silt, and clay. A few layers of sand. Generally sands are fine grained. Most ' <br /> of the sediments have an oxidized appearance as an orange brown color. <br /> • Group B: Top: 28 to 40 feet deep, to bottom: approximately 55 to 75 feet deep (25 to 35 feet <br /> thick) - Interbedded sand, silty sand, silt, and a little clay. Sands are fine grained. Overall a T <br />