Laserfiche WebLink
Page 17 <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE <br /> LEVEL OF <br /> SIGNIFICANCE <br /> ' AFTER <br /> �I SiGN1FICANT MITIGATION <br /> j not be migrating/spawning in this creek, if <br /> work must occur during the fall/winter <br /> months,the National Marine Fisheries <br /> Service(NMFS)should be contacted for <br /> other possible mitigation requirements. <br /> fFurther mitigation for non-summer work <br /> s would be in accordance with 1 <br /> ' recommendations provided by NMFS. <br /> x <br /> # F.10. Construction activities in the North (a)To avoid impacting Central 7work <br /> LS <br /> Branch of the South Fork of Little Johns steelhead in Little Johns Creek,Creek could result in significant adverse roP Pow that would impact thisimpacts to Central California steelhead. should occur in the summer mo <br /> (POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT) this salmon would not be <br /> migrating/spawning in this creek. If work <br /> must occur during the fall/wintcr months, <br /> the National Marine Fisheries Service <br /> ` (NMFS)should be contacted for other <br /> } possible mitigation requirements. <br /> I <br /> F.11. Implementation of the project could (a)To avoid impacting Sacramento LS <br /> result in significant adverse impacts to splittail.populations potentially present in <br /> Sacramento splittail. (POTENTIALLY Little Johns Creek,and to avoid impacts to <br /> SIGNIFICANT) other sensitive fish species potentially <br /> ' <br /> present in this creek,work in the creek <br /> should only be conducted between July 31 <br /> and September 30. If work must occur <br /> outside of these months,NMFS should be <br /> t : contacted. Further mitigation for non- <br /> summer.work would be in accordance with <br /> recommendation provided by NMFS. <br /> Other mitigation could include conducting <br /> turbidity studies to determine if the work <br /> would be detrimental to Sacramento <br /> splittail. <br /> F.12. Implementation of the project could (a)Implementation of the approved LS l <br /> result in significant adverse impacts to wetland mitigation plan(see also <br /> giant garter snake. (POTENTIALLY 'Mitigation Measure F.1.)would <br /> SIGNIFICANT) compensate for impacts to aquatic and <br /> + associated habitat(which is assumed to <br /> constitute giant garter snake habitat) <br /> resulting from creek realignment. In <br /> i accordance with that plan,a total of 39 <br /> F acres of aquatic and associated upland <br /> and riparian habitat shall be created <br /> GRASSE771 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING • <br />�k <br /> i <br />