My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012793
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
EIR-99-2
>
SU0012793
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 12:22:48 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012793
PE
2675
FACILITY_NAME
EIR-99-2
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336-
APN
20106005
ENTERED_DATE
1/6/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\EIR-99-2\PUB REC REL APPL.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
432
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Facts in Support of the Finding: <br /> The potential for impacts on western pond turtles is discussed in Section III.F of the E1R. The <br /> measures above are designed to mitigate impacts on western pond turtles. <br /> n.Impacts on the Greater Western Mastiff Bat <br /> Potential Significant Impact(F.14): <br /> Implementation of the project could result in significant adverse impacts to greater western <br /> mastiff bat. <br /> Finding: <br /> Based upon the analysis in the EIR,pre-construction surveys,provision of bat houses, <br /> replacement,if necessary,of occupied habitat designed with input from the California <br /> Department of Fish and Game, and compliance with the San Joaquin County Multiple-Species <br /> f Conservation and Open Space Plan will make impacts on the greater western mastiff bat less <br /> than significant. <br /> The following mitigation measures will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. <br /> Mitigation Measures (Impact F.14): <br /> (a)Pre-construction surveys for greater western mastiff bat should be conducted prior to <br /> removing any trees from the project site. These pre-construction surveys maybe <br /> i required and funded by the SJMSCP JPA and should be conducted by a biologist with <br /> experience surveying for bats, and the surveys should not occur any more than 30 days <br /> prior to the proposed tree removal. If no special-status bats are identified during the <br /> pre-construction survey(s), then no impacts to these bats would be expected to occur from <br /> construction of the proposed project. If, however,greater western mastiff bat is <br /> identified in any of the trees proposed for removal, reproductive status should be <br /> determined. <br /> (b)Maternity sites should be avoided until batsfnish rearingyoung. Prior to the bats <br /> finishing rearing their young, bat roosts/maternal bat houses should be placed within a <br /> protected area in the vicinity of the roosting/maternity sites if possible. As soon as young <br /> are flying and foraging, the maternity sites should be sealed. Similarly, once bat houses <br /> are installed in protected areas, bats should be evicted from their roost sites within the <br /> project construction zone(i.e., should be evicted from the trees to be removed). Removal <br /> of roost sites should occur during dusk or evening after the bats have left the sites unless <br /> otherwise approved These measures are consistent with the SJMSCP. <br /> (c)Pre-construction surveys would prevent direct take of individuals or maternity sites. <br /> No immediate replacement of roosting habitat has been proposed. If a maternity roost or <br /> occupied roost is detected during pre-construction surveys, the SJMSCP JPA shall <br /> provide adequate replacement for loss of occupied habitat should be designed and <br /> implemented with inputfrom CDFG. Implementation of these mitigation measures would <br /> reduce impacts to levels considered less than significant. <br /> 35 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.