Laserfiche WebLink
Facts in Support of the Finding: <br /> The potential for impacts on western pond turtles is discussed in Section III.F of the E1R. The <br /> measures above are designed to mitigate impacts on western pond turtles. <br /> n.Impacts on the Greater Western Mastiff Bat <br /> Potential Significant Impact(F.14): <br /> Implementation of the project could result in significant adverse impacts to greater western <br /> mastiff bat. <br /> Finding: <br /> Based upon the analysis in the EIR,pre-construction surveys,provision of bat houses, <br /> replacement,if necessary,of occupied habitat designed with input from the California <br /> Department of Fish and Game, and compliance with the San Joaquin County Multiple-Species <br /> f Conservation and Open Space Plan will make impacts on the greater western mastiff bat less <br /> than significant. <br /> The following mitigation measures will mitigate these impacts to below a level of significance. <br /> Mitigation Measures (Impact F.14): <br /> (a)Pre-construction surveys for greater western mastiff bat should be conducted prior to <br /> removing any trees from the project site. These pre-construction surveys maybe <br /> i required and funded by the SJMSCP JPA and should be conducted by a biologist with <br /> experience surveying for bats, and the surveys should not occur any more than 30 days <br /> prior to the proposed tree removal. If no special-status bats are identified during the <br /> pre-construction survey(s), then no impacts to these bats would be expected to occur from <br /> construction of the proposed project. If, however,greater western mastiff bat is <br /> identified in any of the trees proposed for removal, reproductive status should be <br /> determined. <br /> (b)Maternity sites should be avoided until batsfnish rearingyoung. Prior to the bats <br /> finishing rearing their young, bat roosts/maternal bat houses should be placed within a <br /> protected area in the vicinity of the roosting/maternity sites if possible. As soon as young <br /> are flying and foraging, the maternity sites should be sealed. Similarly, once bat houses <br /> are installed in protected areas, bats should be evicted from their roost sites within the <br /> project construction zone(i.e., should be evicted from the trees to be removed). Removal <br /> of roost sites should occur during dusk or evening after the bats have left the sites unless <br /> otherwise approved These measures are consistent with the SJMSCP. <br /> (c)Pre-construction surveys would prevent direct take of individuals or maternity sites. <br /> No immediate replacement of roosting habitat has been proposed. If a maternity roost or <br /> occupied roost is detected during pre-construction surveys, the SJMSCP JPA shall <br /> provide adequate replacement for loss of occupied habitat should be designed and <br /> implemented with inputfrom CDFG. Implementation of these mitigation measures would <br /> reduce impacts to levels considered less than significant. <br /> 35 <br /> 1 <br />