Laserfiche WebLink
Page 72 <br /> According to the San Joaquin County and the City of Stockton's level of service criteria, cumulative <br /> traffic would not have any significant impacts on any of the study intersections except at the Austin <br /> Rd/Mariposa Rd intersection. The results of the cumulative level of service analysis are also presented in <br /> Table D-6. The LOS calculations for the cumulative condition arc provided in Appendix B. <br /> Mitigation D.2. The project's fair share contribution to the traffic signal at Austin Rd/Mariposa Rd <br /> intersection, as described in Mitigation D-1, above, would also mitigate the project's -contribution to <br /> cumulative traffic impacts. ' <br /> Impact D.3. The project could increase pavement wear on nearby streets. <br /> The roadways surrounding the project site currently would not need to be rcpaved in the very near future <br /> but are deteriorating. The County has a backlog of pavement repair and upgrade projects, and the <br /> improvements may take longer than a year to be carried out. Based on the project trip generation, the <br /> proposed project would not cause substantial degradation of pavement quality. However, if the roadways <br /> L were left in this condition, the project would add to the incremental worsening condition of the pavement. <br /> The project impact,however,is not considered to be significant. (Rajappan and Meyer 1999). <br /> r <br /> Mitigation D.3; None Required. <br /> Impact DA. The project could add traffic that could affect traffic safety hazards. . <br /> As presented in the accident summary (see Table D-1), the accident rates on the study roadways are <br /> considerably lower than the statewide average for reported accidents on suburban (defined by Caltrans as <br /> "urbanized areas outside of city limits')two- and three-lane conversion roadways. The number of project <br /> trips added to these surrounding roadways, however, suggests that the project would not cause travel on <br /> the roadways to be less safe than existing conditions. <br /> r Miti ation DA None re uired. <br /> Conclusions <br /> Under all conditions, the operation of the four study intersections would not be impacted during the AM <br /> or PM peak hour, with the exception of the Austin Road/Mariposa Road. intersection which will <br /> experience LOS F during the'AM peak hour,and under cumulative conditions. <br /> The Austin Landfill does-is not solely responsible for this problem, however, it does add some traffic to <br /> further worsen the operating conditions. For this reason, it will be responsible for.some part of the cost. <br /> The Austin Road Landfill project would be responsible for a fair-share contribution of not more than 5% <br /> of the cost of signal installation. <br /> I <br /> r k <br /> �t <br /> i <br /> GItASSETTI EMMONMENTAL CONSULTING <br />