Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.A-14 ' <br /> Forward Inc.Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> The expansion area in the southeast of the existing landfill consists of creek channel and existing <br /> permitted landfill operations(including the composting facility), does not provide viable ' <br /> grazing land because of its small size and isolation from other grazing land, and has not been <br /> used for agriculture for many years. The approximately 8.7 acres in the northeast of the existing <br /> landfill is classified as Urban on the Prime Agricultural Land and Important Farmland Map, ' <br /> and is not viable as grazing land because of its small size and isolation from other grazing land, <br /> and has not been used for agriculture for many years. <br /> The 2013 expansion project included approximately 184 acres of agricultural land located south ' <br /> and west of the current permitted landfill areas. This area is not part of the currently proposed <br /> Project. The 126—acre CYA parcel in the northeast portion of the existing Forward Landfill ' <br /> contains approximately 59.4 acres of agricultural land. The agricultural land in the CYA parcel <br /> would not be affected by the proposed 2018 Expansion Project. <br /> Williamson Act ' <br /> The 2013 EIR discussed Land Conservation(Williamson)Act contracts,and procedures for non- ' <br /> renewal and cancellation for Williamson Act contracts. The 2018 Expansion Project is not on <br /> land subject to a Williamson Act contract. <br /> Multi-Species Conservation and Open Space Plan ' <br /> San Joaquin County adopted the San Joaquin Multi-Species Conservation and Open Space Plan ' <br /> (SJMSCP) in February 2001. The SJMSCP serves as comprehensive mitigation for impacts to <br /> threatened, endangered, rare, and other unlisted SJMSCP Covered Species. Participation in the <br /> SJMSCP is voluntary. Forward, Inc. is currently participating in the SJMSCP for the existing ' <br /> landfill. <br /> Airport Land Use Conflicts-Bird Strikes and Gull Survey Evaluations <br /> The 2013 EIR discussed available information on bird strikes. The following paragraph updates <br /> that discussion with new information available at the time this SEIR was prepared (Davis,2017, ' <br /> see Appendix D for a copy of this report). The Federal Aviation Administration(FAA)began <br /> tracking bird/aircraft collisions nationwide, including at the Stockton Airport(SCK) in 1990. <br /> The FAA database documenting bird/aircraft collisions contained records of 62 bird and ' <br /> mammal strikes associated with the Stockton Airport, as of April 30,2016 (Davis,2017). One of <br /> the 62 reported strikes involved a black-tailed jackrabbit. Of the 61 strike reports from Stockton <br /> Airport that involved birds, one involved a gull(carcass only) and four others might have <br /> involved gulls. Even allowing for significant under-reporting of bird strikes,five strikes at SCK <br /> in over 27 years with no damage reported indicates that the Forward Landfill has not posed a <br /> significant threat to aircraft using the Stockton Metropolitan Airport. Thirty-eight of the ' <br /> reported bird strikes at SCK occurred since the gull control program was instituted at Forward <br /> Landfill in the winter of 2010-2011. These strikes involved Barn Owls(4), a Burrowing Owl, a <br /> White-tailed Kite, Red-tailed Hawks (3),Swainson's Hawks(4), a Turkey Vulture, an American <br /> Kestrel, Horned Larks (4,Western Meadowlarks(3),Killdeers(2), an American Pipit, a Rock <br />