My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0011836
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800090
>
SU0011836
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2023 10:35:38 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:04:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0011836
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800090
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336-
APN
20106003, -05, 18115007, -16
ENTERED_DATE
6/26/2018 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/15/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\EHD COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\DRAFT SEIR-09-2018.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\EIR-07-2018.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.A-23 <br /> Forward Inc.Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> lowest OCS is approximately 210 to 230 feet Above Mean Sea Level(AMSL) over the project <br /> ' area.Therefore the proposed 180.7'AMSL South Infill and 190'AMSL Northeast Infill would <br /> not penetrate this OCS, and therefore would not have an adverse impact on arrival procedures <br /> at SCK. <br /> Each instrument approach procedure to SCK contains a Circle-to-Land option.The circle-to- <br /> land portion of the procedure allows a pilot to approach the airport in instrument conditions <br /> then,when the airport environment is in sight,the pilot can maneuver the aircraft to the <br /> opposite end of the runway to land.A pilot would execute this type of instrument approach <br /> procedure if the winds were not favorable for landing on the primary runway for which the <br /> ' procedure was designed. The surfaces which protect the Circle-to-Land consist of horizontal <br /> circular surfaces that extend from the end of each runway.The radius of each circle is <br /> dependent on the category of aircraft utilizing the Circle-to-Land approach. A project would <br /> not impact the Circle-to-Land protected airspace if it does not penetrate the OCS described <br /> above. The proposed expansion project would not penetrate the OCS and,therefore,would not <br /> have an adverse impact on Circle-to-Land procedures at SCK. <br /> The Initial Climb Area(ICA) associated with SCK's departure procedures was analyzed, using <br /> SCK's standard Climb Gradient of 200 feet per Nautical Mile(NM) for aircraft departing <br /> Runway 11L. Neither portion of the proposed project would penetrate this ICA or have an <br /> adverse impact on departure procedures at SCK. <br /> An analysis of SCK's Visual Flight Rule (VFR)Traffic Pattern Airspace was completed to <br /> determine the maximum elevation to which a landfill could be erected without impacting <br /> aircraft operating in visual conditions at SCK. Neither portion of the proposed project would <br /> penetrate the VFR Traffic Pattern for SCK. <br /> In summary, the proposed final grades of the 2018 Expansion Project would not(a) penetrate <br /> obstruction criteria for Stockton Metropolitan Airport(SCK), (b)penetrate Obstacle Clearance <br /> Surfaces(OCS) or Circle-to-Land Obstacle Clearance Surfaces (OCS),or have an adverse impact <br /> on arrival procedures at SCK, (c)have an adverse impact on departure procedures at SCK, or <br /> (d)penetrate the Visual Flight Rule(VFR)Traffic Pattern for SCK. (Williams Aviation <br /> Consultants,2017). Therefore, the final grades of the proposed expansion project would have a <br /> less-than-significant impact on safety due to conflict with FAR height limits or the airport <br /> imaginary space. <br /> However,when the two expansion areas have been filled to an elevation near their permitted <br /> heights,equipment operating on top of the landfill could temporarily intrude into the conical <br /> space. Forward would continue its procedure of submitting a Notice of Proposed Construction <br /> or Alteration(FAA Form 7460-1) at least 45 days prior to operation of any equipment that could <br /> temporarily intrude into the imaginary surface, as required by the Federal Aviation <br /> Administration(FAA) for all proposed construction or alterations that could intrude into the <br /> airport imaginary surface. The FAA would then issue a Notice to Airmen(NOTAM)notifying <br /> pilots of the temporary intrusion into the airspace. This would reduce the impact of operating <br /> equipment on the conical space to a less-than-significant level. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.