Laserfiche WebLink
F <br /> 23 <br /> inaccessible due to a variety of environmental, as well as legal, <br /> constraints. In reference to the subject proposed project, the <br /> northeastern area is presently an almond orchard. Survey could be <br /> y conducted only on service roads and along the rows of trees. <br /> During the course of field search for cultural resources, <br /> technicians are alert to the possible presence of a wide variety, <br /> i; of archaeological and historical cultural resources that prefield <br /> research indicates are likely, or are known, to be present on the <br /> < proposed project area. Special attention is given to areas in <br /> drainageways and near springs and drainage confluences, and to <br /> ridge crests, knolls, bare ground, and other locations that <br /> prefield research indicates might have been suitable for human <br /> occupation, as evidenced by the presence of village sites, <br /> resource utilization sites, and/or various types of historic <br /> sites. <br /> Attention is given to historic remains such as barns, <br /> windmills, developed springs, rock walls, and other features. <br /> Natural features, such- as outcrops and boulders, are examined inr` <br /> search of bedrock mortar milling cups, which prefield sensitivity <br /> assessment might indicate as likely to be present on a proposed <br /> project area. Subsurface soil exposed in drainageways, roadcuts - <br /> rodent burrows and other locations is examined, and trowel tests <br /> are made in specific locations, but shovel tests or other types <br /> of excavations are not undertaken unless required, as determined . <br /> on ,a proposed project-specific basis. <br /> Cultural resources are recorded on standard forms (State of <br /> California DPR 422 A or H, Rev. 4/86) or DPR 523-Test (12/93) . <br /> Photographs are taken and field maps of the cultural resources <br /> are drafted. Site locations are plotted on U.S. Geological Survey <br /> . � G (USGS) quadrangles and on project-specific maps, as available. <br /> Cultural Resources Evaluation, Significance, and Integrity; <br /> E Management Considerations; Publication; <br /> Curation of Specimens and Data <br /> cultural resources found on aosed iven proposed g P P Project are <br /> recorded and evaluated, to the extent permitted by the types of <br /> data obtained during survey, in reference to whether a given <br /> cultural resource is "significant" pursuant to the criteria of <br /> the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) [36 CFR 60.4 (a- <br /> d) ] and accordingly merits nomination to the NRNP, or is' "unique" <br /> ' in reference to the standards of State of California CEQA/EIR <br /> Guidelines, Appendix K. <br /> A <br /> i <br /> l <br /> I i <br />