My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012821
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BRANDT
>
13751
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-91-15
>
SU0012821
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2020 5:16:09 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:36:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012821
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-91-15
STREET_NUMBER
13751
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
BRANDT
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LOCKEFORD
Zip
95237-
APN
01906029
ENTERED_DATE
1/9/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
13751 E BRANDT RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\B\BRANDT\13751\SU-91-15\REV SITE PLN.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.� 'The California Endangered Species Act (Fish and Game Code Section 2b50, et seq.) is <br /> inapplicable to the County of San Joaquin.` <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> Discretionary development projects reviewed and acted upon by San Joaquin County are not <br /> exempt from the requirements of the CESA. The Conditions of Approval relating to the <br /> Swainson's hawk were developed and adopted in order to comply with both the CESA and the <br /> appropriate sections of the California Public Resources Code.which implement the CESA. <br /> 5. APPEAL STATEMENT: <br /> Y <br /> 'The draft document entitled'Mitigation Guidelines for Swainson's Hawks in the Central Valley of <br /> California`has not been adopted by either the Fish and Game Commission or the Department of <br /> Fish and Game.' <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> The noted document was in a draft form in late 9990 when the EIR for the project was being <br /> prepared and has been subsequently revised, though not finalized. The document is only <br /> intended to provide guidelines to lead agencies and project sponsors to follow in developing <br /> adequate mitigation for the loss of Swainson's hawk habitat. It was not used as the basis for <br /> determining either the need for or the amount of off-site habitat necessary to mitigate the <br /> proposed project's potential impacts to the endangered species. The status of the noted <br /> document is, therefore, not relevant to the appeal. Y <br /> 6. APPEAL STATEMENT: <br /> The one-half-mile buffer is arbitrary and unenforceable. Construction activities are already under <br /> way by competitors on adjoining sites." <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> The condition was developed by the DFG in order to minimize potential disruption to Swainson's <br /> hawks that may be actively nesting on the site. The condition will not apply if there are no active <br /> nesting sites on the project site or if the DFG grants prior approval for an alternate means of <br /> mitigation. The condition applies only to this site and is not affected by construction activities on <br /> other property in the vicinity. <br /> 7. APPEAL STATEMENT: <br /> "Residential development projects did not cause the initial decline in the number of Swainson's , <br /> hawks in the Central Valley.' <br /> RESPONSE: <br /> The developer is not being asked to mitigate for past impacts to the Swainson's hawk; only for <br /> those impacts directly related to the approved project. The adopted Conditions of Approval <br /> contain the measures deemed satisfactory by the DFG to mitigate the project's impacts on the <br /> threatened species. <br /> BOS LETTER PAGE 3. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.