My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012826
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BRANDT
>
26255
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-91-04
>
SU0012826
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2020 9:01:55 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:38:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012826
PE
2605
FACILITY_NAME
QX-91-04
STREET_NUMBER
26255
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
BRANDT
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240-
APN
02324001
ENTERED_DATE
1/10/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26255 E BRANDT RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\B\BRANDT\26255\QX-91-4\PRE-APP.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Chandler Martin <br /> Page 4 <br /> If the proposed end use of the site is to return the area to <br /> rangeland, then the operator should salvage available <br /> topsoil for treatment of the reclaimed landform. The <br /> quality of the resultant rangeland will likely be limited if <br /> topsoil is not salvaged and respread. <br /> 10. CCR Section 3503 (8) requires that appropriate revegetation <br /> methods be used for reclaiming a site. The plan puts forth <br /> very little, and contradictory, information on revegetating <br /> the site; i.e, the plan states that the site will be <br /> 1 reseeded with native grasses and that the site will be <br /> allowed to revegetate naturally (without reseeding) . <br /> The reclamation plan for this site should include a full <br /> revegetation plan that details the type of seed, methods of <br /> t seeding, season of seeding, any proposed soil amendments, <br /> etc. The best method for determining the species to be used <br /> to revegetate a site is to note the species currently <br /> growing on that site (refer back to comment #5) . <br /> 11. Recent amendments to SMARA (Assembly Bills 3551 and <br /> 3903/Chapters 1097 and 1101, Statutes of 1990) , which became <br /> effective January 1, 1991, require that financial assurances <br /> be required of all surface mining operations to guarantee <br /> site reclamation; that the financial assurances be payable <br /> to the SMARA lead agency and the State Geologist; that the <br /> financial assurances be submitted to the State Geologist for <br /> his review and comment; and that lead agencies annually <br /> inspect mining operations to determine SMARA compliance. <br /> These requirements should be incorporated into the <br /> reclamation plan prior to approval . <br /> Section 2774 (d) of the same legislation requires that lead <br /> agencies send a copy of the reclamation plan to the State <br /> Geologist for review no less than 45 days prior to approval . <br /> The lead agency is also required to prepare a written . <br /> response describing the disposition of the major issues <br /> raised. In particular, when the lead agencies position is <br /> at variance with recommendations and objections raised in <br /> the State Geologist' s comments, the written response shall <br /> address, in detail, why specific comments and suggestions <br /> were not .accepted. Written comments received and responses <br /> prepared by the lead agency should be forwarded to the <br /> operator. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.