My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012869
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CALIMYRNA
>
3400
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-6
>
SU0012869
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2022 11:29:23 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:49:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012869
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-6
STREET_NUMBER
3400
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
CALIMYRNA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
Zip
95220-
APN
00514503
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3400 E CALIMYRNA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\jcastaneda
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CALIMYRNA\3480\SU-92-6_GP-92-8_ZR-92-8\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LO ® 1 AIRPORT <br /> Highway 99&Jahant Road <br /> P.O. Drawer "B" <br /> Acampo, CA 95220 Serving General Aviation Since 1929 <br /> ROBERT KUPKA,owner <br /> (209) 369.9126 <br /> February 14 , 1992 <br /> Richard Larrouy 3. D. <br /> San Joaquin County Planning Dept. <br /> 1810 E. Hazelton ' <br /> Stockton, Ca. 95205 199 <br /> RE . SU-92-6 F <br /> Dear Mr. Larrouy, <br /> I received notification of an application to rezone 30 . 79 acres <br /> of agricultural land to residential . This acreage is less than <br /> one-half of a mile off the end of runway 32 at airport . It is I <br /> also directly under the landing pattern for both runways 26 and <br /> 8 . <br /> Allowing a subdivision like this to be developed under .three <br /> different air access ' to the airport would eventually have the <br /> affect of closing the airport down. It would be inconsistent <br /> with the Airport Land Use Plan adopted by the County of San <br /> Joaquin. The State of California Division of Aeronautics has <br /> specifications for housing around this airport and this proposed <br /> subdivision does not fall within their parameters. <br /> The health and safety of individuals it at stake if a proposal <br /> such as this is adopted. Noise levels aim a constant problem <br /> with housing around an airport. Since runway 26 was resurfaced <br /> two years ago there has been a significant amount of jet traffic <br /> in and out of .Lodi Airport, mainly parent companies flying in to <br /> check on their local subsidiaries such as General Mills . We have <br /> had very few noise complaints from long time residents of this <br /> area but as soon as one small portion of the now defunct Woodson <br /> Estates project .was built without notifying the airport we have <br /> been .inundated with complaints and so has your department. <br /> I attended the zoning meeting for the 20 year master plan update <br /> on October 11, 1990 . At that meeting it was voted to leave all <br /> the existing ag property in this area in ag . A variety of <br /> expansion plans were presented to the planing commisions <br /> regarding rezoning at that hearing , including one for this <br /> airport , and they were all rejected. <br /> In conclusion, a subdivision of this nature located under three <br /> of the four air access ' to the Lodi Airport would eventually <br /> condemn the airport. Secondly, this conversion of ag land is not <br /> consistent with zoning in this area. If in fact this subdivision <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.