|
ry
<br /> Mr. R6b&n T(d'Mfh& Page 4 of 5
<br /> Comrhe6ts-on CUF-Site.CI6sdfe RebdrWm&hdbtioJns Ddceihbor 15, 2011
<br /> notifications of impending .,site. closure. Monitoring wells Must still be destroyed and
<br /> certificates of disposal of I.D-W most be r1e,cei.vad p.rior.to issuance mof a closure letter..
<br /> CUF Claihi 'No., 8109 (Cher-OR66 -TrLickirfgi 3535 :Cherokee Road, Stockton) — R000rt
<br /> Noeded. The EHD has. directed preparation of a no4rther-action-requesi report and Will
<br /> -review it When it has' been.:submitted. 'If the report i,s,fAv6fable and adequate, the EHD will
<br /> initiate the closure process. Monitoring wells must:-still be destroyed and Certificates of
<br /> disposal 6f IDVV.rnUst be received prior to,'iswonoe of a closure letter,
<br /> CUF C14im No. 108411 '(former .Deb's Auto, 308:S-,. 'El Dorado 'Street, Stockton) — Report
<br /> C has.direc
<br /> Needed. In view of ihe• CUF clp8ure recommendation, the FiHO ted preparation
<br /> and submittal of a hUrr"ah health risk' assessment, a vapor intrusion evaluatioh, ~mater well
<br /> sampling, an estimate of-the time required 1oachieve water quality reduction'
<br /> (W, -Q'Qs), and
<br /> J
<br /> a. reductioof monitoring-weft s�'ompling. The re pprt of findihgt shbolld .be, submitted.tted. in an
<br /> NEAR report, if appircipria'te. The EHD.will carefully review the 'report and initiate the closure
<br /> process a's warranted.
<br /> CUF,Claim'' No. 12228 (former 6Ljdiss'Pobtia&, 2450 Tostie'Roa'd,'Tr6q) Rdplort Needed,
<br /> An NEAR report. is in preparation. Upon receipt and review of the report, if favorable and
<br /> adequate' the END AfilHn itiatO'the.Closure.I process.
<br /> CUF Claim No. 12958 (Five-Star Manna,.345 -W. Yosemite Avenue, Stockton) — in Final
<br /> 'Closure Process. The riotificafi66 of "pending -site d6sUrp :has been "i'99uod to (tie
<br /> CVRWQCB, Upon corfilpletiog of the notification period, the miohit6ih9:; 'W6118 must be:
<br /> destroypd and certificates- of disposal for the. IOW must-be submitted 'to the:EHD so the
<br /> closure letter can be issued.
<br /> GUF Claim! No. 13578 (Flame. Liquor, 7301 VV.. Kettl.eman- Lane, Lodi) " On Final Closure
<br /> Process. Permits hAVe been: 18sOdd for the ft!'OhitVing well destructions. Certificates of
<br /> disposal for the IDW will be needed prior to issuing the closure letter.
<br /> CUF Claim No. 13729 (form-er Thrifty 'Oil, 1.250 N. Wilson.fty, Stockton) �.- in Final
<br /> Closure Process. The.JO-day closufe: 'n6fifidation: has been sent''tu -th6, .GV.RVVQ,CB.
<br /> Monitoring wells must still be destroyed'arid certificates of disposal of'IDVV,:Must be.received
<br /> by the EHD prior to issuing the,closure,Metter:
<br /> CUF Claim No; 13849 (5uper. Stop: Mart, 29;0 Main Street Manteca) in, Final Closure
<br /> Process. The 30-day cl6sure.,Ootjficatioii.ha:§,,b6en.s6ritto the CVRVVQCB., Monikrlhg
<br /> o i . wells
<br /> must still be destroyed and-certificates:Of-disposal of I DW must be received dortbi5suance
<br /> of a.closure letter.
<br /> CUF Glairt! No.. 14167 (Navarra PrbportV,, .75GO W. Eleventh Street, Tra.6yy — Rbpoil
<br /> Needed. The EHD direct6d I preparation of an .NFAR that pulled together ail.current data to
<br /> assure that All issues have beeh Erddhes�sed, The consultant is decliniihq16.,pfepare the
<br /> report, indicating that the information has,already been presented in variou.s, reports. The
<br /> EHD will,P0,111he information together-as time: 0
<br /> ''ermits-
<br /> CUF Claim No. 15783 (AM/PM, 3250 ,VV' HamMCSr Lane, Stockton) —.Reoort Needed. By
<br /> letter dated,25 May 2011, the EH© had responded to the draft annual five-year review letter
<br /> dated 18 April 2011, in whi& the CUF recchiM6nded consideration-' of: site. after
<br /> fl
<br /> pushing fbr groundwater remediation the, previous three years. An ozone injection
<br /> on system
<br /> was ready to go online at that time, so 'the EHD requested that the Five-Year Review
<br /> committee reconsider the closure recommendation pending the results,of at.-least the ozone
<br /> injection pilot test. The Five-Year Review committee did not respond di.re6tly to,the fl]D, but
<br /> had apparently debded to continue..with site closure as evidenced by the. unmodified 18
<br /> April .2011 letter being uploaded to GeoT,racker on 20 ,tune 2011 As the CO'F rive-Year
<br /> Review committee has decided the site should .be closed, the EHD will direct 0.roparation of
<br /> an NFAR that includes the results of the ozone injection pilot test,
<br />
|