Laserfiche WebLink
April 29,'2005 <br /> NOA Project Number:-E05040A <br /> a Test No., Percolation Percolation Rate Test Comment <br /> Date Tested Test Depth'(ft) (minutes/inch) Duration (see notes) <br /> rj = iL P-20 deep,4/20/05,.. <br /> Z4.39 Parcel 20 '39 3.13 .4-hr. Satisfactory percolation rate <br /> Note: A satisfactory percolation rate for a."shallow'-test is less than or equal to 60 minutes per inch. <br /> f A satisfactory percolation rate for a"deep".tesi is less than or equal to 30 minutes per inch. <br /> 6.7 Discussion of Percolation Test Results <br /> FAThe soils within the sewage disposal areas of all parcels of the site have demonstrated a satisfactory <br /> g P P <br /> percolation rate in accordance with the requirements of the EHD for the use of a standard septic <br /> system. <br /> 6.8 Discussion of Septic System-Sizing <br /> Septic System Construction should follow the San Joaquin County On-Site WlastewaterDisposal <br /> Standards where applicable. Refer to the attached Nitrate Loading Study for additional discussion of <br /> recommendations for the project. <br /> 7.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> In summary, percolation rates that meet the minimum EHD standards were achieved in the <br /> proposed septic disposal areas of each.of the proposed parcels. Refer to the attached Nitrate <br /> Loading Study fora further discussion of conclusions for the project. <br /> No ground water was encountered in any of the borings drilled on the property:The on-site water <br /> well was tested for nitrate and DBCP. .DBCP and was non-detectable in the water sample. Nitrate <br /> was found at 13.7 mg/L,-NO3, below the MCL of 45 mg/L-NO3. <br /> 7.1 Signatures <br /> The signatures of the enviroriinental professionals involved in the preparation of this report can be <br /> found at the front of this package. <br /> 8.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the existing and <br /> proposed development, the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the <br /> time we excavated our test holes and performed the percolation tests. It was assumed that the test <br /> holes and percolation test_results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the general area. <br /> 11 <br />