Laserfiche WebLink
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY kL1 <br /> ,� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br /> Development Services Division <br /> Attention: Chandler Martin <br /> Re: Application No. SII-92-15 <br /> January 13 , 1999 <br /> Page 3 <br /> potential contamination of the local groundwater supply" was not <br /> even considered. At the Board hearing in 1997 , at the time <br /> extension request, Mr. Hantzsche, an engineer with a background in <br /> water analysis, explained to the Board how the environmental impact <br /> report, dated 1992 , by Kleinfelder Engineering, used false and <br /> IE misleading information to show that. there would be no groundwater <br /> contamination. This report had been available to the developers' <br /> attorneys for months before the hearing and he, in fact, presented <br /> evidence to the Board about this false and misleading information. <br /> What this indicates is that the initial environmental impact report <br /> was knowingly prepared containing misleading analysis of the <br /> "groundwater pollution. " Initially, Mr. Hantzsche had been <br /> involved in the environmental impact report by the developers. He <br /> was then terminated and went to Kleinfelder Engineering after they <br /> did not even get the report that they wanted concerning the one- <br /> acre subdivision. This' report alone compels the need for an <br /> environmental impact report. <br /> - Secondly, the Community Development -=Department ignores the <br /> 100% vocal community opposition to this project. Aside from all <br /> the reasons below, the developers bought this property and let an <br /> orchard die from lack of water, remove the orchard and had been <br /> trying to develop it without regard to any type of CEQA <br /> considerations for the past ten (10) years. They had the zoning <br /> rechanged -but there is no consistent. line with the zoning <br /> (originally it had been the Central Traction Railroad tracks) . On <br /> December 8 , 1998 , I presented the Board with „a petition signed by <br /> 373 residents surrounding the project, requesting that the zoning <br /> be changed back from rural residential one to Ag 40. <br /> Finally, there is no indication from the developers that they <br /> have ever been able to obtain the consent from Central Traction <br /> Railroad to put • a ' water line along the railroad tracks to the <br /> Calaveras River to hold a draining basin. Without that consent <br /> from the railroad, the project cannot go forward. It has now been <br /> over four years since it has been approved and still there is no <br /> consent. If the developers have not been able to obtain it in this <br /> four year period, it would seen unlikely that they will be able to <br /> obtain it in the future. If there is no place to drain the water <br /> t <br /> r <br />