My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Y: ,Peat Form <br /> ' I Howard Selirnnan appeal the decision made by the <br /> IXaur Name) regarding <br /> Planning commission on (Date of Action) <br /> "GP-87-16• ZR-87-35• SU-87-23 <br /> (File Number and Name of Item) <br /> Be thorough---only the findings and facts you <br /> include in your appeal will be considered at <br /> the appeal hearing. Attach additional sheets <br /> if necessary. <br /> State the basis of the appeal (list any findings of fact made by the <br /> Planning commission which were wrong and the reasons why they are <br /> wrong). If you wish to appeal a specific condition list it and the <br /> reasons the condition should be changed or removed: <br /> The basis for the appeal is the Commission's position not to expand <br /> the Mora da Rura ResidentialArea east o the Centrala z ornia <br /> Traction RR as a means of precluding accitional grow <br /> State facts contrary. to the decision (list -any facts that support your <br /> appeal) : The Planning Staff's recommendation for approval of GP-87-16, <br /> ZR-87- 5, and SU-87-23 Gate March 1988, agenaa 1 em 'n /, proviaes <br /> the Facts in support oz our position, along wi n app scan s concurrence <br /> o the requirements lor PUID.Lic water ana terminal drainage. <br /> w- I realize that this appeal will prevent action on this item from <br /> becoming effective and that no permits will be issued until final <br /> action on the appeal is taken.' The above is true to my own knowledge, <br /> information or belief. ' <br /> 11:11, 1 11111 <br /> DO NOT SIGN UNTIL YOU HAVE READ THIS FORM. <br /> I -certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and <br /> correct and that I am (check one) : <br /> E3 Applicant Q Agent (attach proof of the applicant's - <br /> consent to the appeal) <br /> ® Iyeubmitted oral or written testimony on the. application. w - <br /> I attended the public hearing on <br /> 1-was prevented from particlpating by circumstances beyond my ; <br /> j r control (attach xplanathon) . - <br /> - Sign • Date 18 March 1988 p <br /> Name Howard Selitrran Attcrnev <br /> Address g505 nrccisri Ln <br /> Telephone (209) <br /> City/zip Code 951-B19D <br /> - FOR OFFICE USE ONLY <br /> Appeal Fee Z�C�, " Receipt Number <br /> `'. Approximately how much time .to allow for the appeal <br /> Appeal accepted by 5Du.t � pate <br /> N_ (7/84} - <br /> BOS LETTER PAGE 4 _ -_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.