My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> 1. Does it appear that any environmental feature of the project <br /> will generate significant public concern or controversy? <br /> (X) Yes ( ) No Nature of concern(s) : There is considerable <br /> neighborhood opRosition to this project dealing with issues of <br /> traffic conversion of a ricultural land to residential water <br /> su 1V, contamination of water, and overcr wding of schools. <br /> 2 . Will the project require approval or permits by agencies other <br /> than the County? (X) Yes ( ) No <br /> Agency name(s) : Central California Traction Company for <br /> the terminal drainage route to Mokelumne River. <br /> 3 . Is the project within the Sphere of Influence, or within two <br /> miles, of any city? <br /> (X) Yes ( ) No City: Stockton <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: <br /> "Yes" may only be checked in situations where there is substantial evidence to <br /> indicate that there may be a significant adverse impact on the environment if <br /> there is no change in the project description. (CEQA Guidelines, Sec. 15064) <br /> See the "Discussion" section at the end of the initial Study for explanation of <br /> any impacts checked "Yes", or any "No" answer marked with an asterisk (*) . <br /> Sources. The following sources of information have been used in determining <br /> environmental impacts: <br /> original source materials. and maps on file in the community Development <br /> Department including: all County and City general plans and community plans; <br /> assessor parcel books; various local and FEMA flood zone maps; service district <br /> maps; maps of geologic instability; maps and reports on endangered species such <br /> as the Natural Diversity Data Base; noise contour maps; specific roadway plans; <br /> maps and/or records of archeological/historic resources; soil reports and maps; <br /> etc. Many of these original source materials have been collected from other <br /> public agencies or from previously prepared EIR's and other technical studies. <br /> Additional standard sources which should be specifically cited below include <br /> on-site visits by staff (note date); staff knowledge or experience; and <br /> independent environmental studies submitted to the county as part of the project <br /> application (note report title, date, and consultant) . <br /> YES NO <br /> 1. WATER: <br /> a. Is any portion of the project <br /> subject to flood hazard? X <br /> Flood zone C <br /> Initial Study <br /> (Rev:01/91) <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.