My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012885
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CANEPA
>
8721
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-92-15
>
SU0012885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 4:51:22 PM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:53:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012885
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
SU-92-15
STREET_NUMBER
8721
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CANEPA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08640008
ENTERED_DATE
1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8721 N CANEPA RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\C\CANEPA\8721\SU-92-15_SU-87-21\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br /> Development Services Division <br /> Attention: Chandler Martin <br /> Re: Application NO. SII-92-15 <br /> January 13 , 1999 <br /> Page 4 <br /> that is going to be coming off this project, then the project is <br /> improperly designed and there should be an environmental impact <br /> report to study what should be done with this water. I would note <br /> that developers admit that the slope leads of the property leads <br /> onto the houses that are on the east side of the property (not the <br /> farmland that surrounds it) . These houses would then be flooded in <br /> heavy rains. <br /> I will now address the environmental concerns per the <br /> checklist that is attached hereto .as Exhibit 2 , which should have <br /> been followed by the County (not the obsolete one) . <br /> I. Aesthetics <br /> This development would have a potentially significant <br /> impact on the scenic vista. It would change the quality of the <br /> site and further, create substantial light and glare during the <br /> nighttime. This is farmland and by putting buildings, gates, -� <br /> street lights, etc. , would be a dramatic change of the environment <br /> in which it is located. <br /> IF. Agricultural Resources <br /> This would have a significant effect of taking 40 acres <br /> now and another 20 acres from prime farmland into a development <br /> that is not needed. At the present time, there are 180 lots for <br /> sale in the area of Morada which have not been sold and are <br /> available for development. This subdivision represents uncheckered <br /> growth and the conversion of prime farmland. <br /> III. Air Quality <br /> This subdivision would potentially significantly impact <br /> the air quality because of the use of pesticides in the neighboring <br /> farmlands and the use of aerial spraying. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.