Laserfiche WebLink
Report: Groundwater-quality Monitoring—June 23-28,2005, 7500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, CA. Page 9 <br /> 2.0 JUNE 2005 GROUNDWATER-QUALITY MONITORING ROUND <br /> Between June 23 and 28 2005, SJC conducted.the eighteenth round of groundwater- <br /> quality monitoring at the 7500 West Eleventh Street site. The depth to groundwater was <br /> measured in all of the 27 groundwater quality and floating product monitoring wells <br /> extant on the site. <br /> The scope of groundwater sampling conducted in June 2005 was designed to incorporate <br /> both the findings from the natural attenuation studies that had been conducted on the site <br /> in March 2005 and the results of a Monitoring and Remediation Optimization System <br /> (MAROS) study, which was also conducted at that time in the manner advocated by the <br /> United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) and the California <br /> Environmental Protection Agency (Cal-EPA) (The San Joaquin Company 2006). <br /> Although the results of the MAROS and natural attenuations studies called for quarterly <br /> ;# <br /> recovery of groundwater samples from only Monitoring Wells MW-3, MW-7 and MW- <br /> 13, SJC, to ensure an abundance of conservatism, recommended that, for a period of one <br /> year following the March 2005 sampling round, additional wells located along the long <br /> axis of the primary plume, at key locations on its western and eastern periphery and in the <br /> secondary plume of affected groundwater that is present on the site should be sampled. <br /> ,.' That recommendation resulted in the proposal to recover samples from Monitoring Wells <br /> MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-5, MW-7, MW-10, MW-11, MW-12, MW-13, MW-16, <br /> MW-17, MW-18, MW--19, MWFP-1, MWFP-2,MWFP-4 and MWFP-5 (see Figure 3 for <br /> locations). With the exception of recovery of a sample from Monitoring Well MW-13, <br /> that proposal was implemented in the June 2005 monitoring round. (Note: It had been <br /> intended to include recovery a sample from Monitoring Well MW-13 but, due to an error <br /> => in the directions issued to the sampling team, a sample was not recovered from that well.) <br /> 2.1 Groundwater Elevations and Flow Direction <br /> To initiate the June 2005 sampling program, the depth to groundwater in each of the 27 <br /> monitoring wells was measured using a conductivity probe on June 20, 2005. The water <br /> table elevations were computed relative to mean sea level (MSL). <br /> The groundwater elevations presented in Table 1 were used to generate the groundwater <br /> contours shown on Figure 2. However, because, as is noted in Table 3, an apparent 0.02 <br /> ft. of floating product was detected in Monitoring Well MW-7, the groundwater elevation <br /> in that well was corrected for the purpose of drawing the groundwater contours to allow <br /> for the depression of the water table in the vicinity of that well by the hydrocarbon fuel <br /> products floating on the surface of the water. The correction was derived as follows: <br /> Assume Specific Gravity of Diesel=0.84 <br /> Assume Specific Gravity of Gasoline=0.74 <br /> .'l <br /> For the purpose of computing the required adjustment, it was assumed that relative <br /> r: <br /> proportions of diesel and gasoline in the floating product in Monitoring Well MW-7 are <br /> SJC <br />