Laserfiche WebLink
Page 14 <br /> 500 West Eleventh Street, Tracy, CA. <br /> ]deport: Groundwater-quality Monitoring- <br /> June 23-28,2005, 7 M <br /> of Concern in Groundwater <br /> Mon),Prince al Plume Axis a <br /> f al es 4 <br /> 2 5.1 An as is shown on Figure 3, <br /> MW-16 and MW-18, are, groundwater. <br /> Wells MW-3, MW-7' Prim plume of affected gr <br /> Monitoring axis of the p es of <br /> along the approximate long om ared to the concentrations of analytes <br /> } arrayed g inspection of Table at C p <br /> As can be seen by p o de 2, samples recovered from those nelrall higher <br /> les recovered in June 2005 ls in <br /> Were generally concern that were found in the gr le, the <br /> 2005, the concentrations in the same Well MW 3 rose from 2,300 <br /> ed is samples recovered from the same wells. For example, <br /> than those <br /> measured in the groundwater in Morutori g Well MW-18 <br /> concentration of TP detected in Monitoring <br /> µg/l, to 5, <br /> 100 uglL• The concentration of Ten d <br /> rose from 51 µg/L to 65 µg/L over that time p <br /> les recovered along the <br /> tend a pattern of seasonal increase and neC1ntoein <br /> the <br /> Those increases in concentrations of ext <br /> of concern in sum er g <br /> Tri groundwater principal plume axis in June 2005 e regional agricultural <br /> e concentrations of fuel hydrocarbons that are related to gr <br /> th <br /> of analytes of concern to reach a seasonal <br /> affected soil in response to the seasonal increases in regi <br /> zone of oral concentration <br /> irrigation that cause temp summer months. <br /> maximum during the <br /> 2.5.2 Anal es o <br /> f Concern in Ground�'�'ater around Fnn �ofrince al Plume <br /> Of the groundwater samples <br /> analyses see Table 2) 27 2005 show that, <br /> amination of the results of thee -2 and MW-5 on June , on the western <br /> Ex Monitoring Wells <br /> recovered frons M e 3 had reduced to non- <br /> `i -- conditions in March 2005, the concentrations of these along <br /> compered to Plume of affected groundwater {see Figur ) <br /> rind alp es of concern detected in those wells was <br /> fringes of the p p <br /> detectable concentrations. The only other analyt oundwater, as was first <br /> ations similar to those observed in <br /> edMarch 2005. Further s <br /> to e <br /> MTBE in trace concentr Plume of affect gr round at a <br /> =" erimeter of the p <br /> north along the western p oundwater-quality inOmtOnnresent in the <br /> observed in the results of the March 2005 gr was again found to be p <br /> L a trace of MTBE <br /> concentration of 0.54 µgf 'concentration of 0.59 [.g[L As was Previously on the development ofta <br /> 17 at ated there -upon in MW- well MW-lb. <br /> is believed that the MTBE now cin entered near <br /> Monitoring <br /> groundwater mound that e concentrations of analytes of concern <br /> minor differences in the W-10 during the lune <br /> There were only relatively 4 MWFP-2� MWF the and M <br /> t Monitoring Wells h�lW- results from the March 2005 <br /> f:3 detected in aced to the corresponding <br /> 2005 same <br /> ling round Comp ns along the eastern perimeter of the principal <br /> 1 <br /> lin round. This indicates that conditions <br /> I ` ' <br /> sampling <br /> affected groundwater at the Navarra Site remain stable. <br /> plume groundwater, the <br /> unit of the primary plume of affected le recovered <br /> At the down-gradient 1 analyte of Concern detected in the sainp between <br /> the only to 12 l.g/L <br /> concentration of MTBE, 11, fell from a concentration of 14 µWell MW-19, which <br /> :. <br /> from Monitoring Well MW- groundwater in Monitoring <br /> Mar 9, 2005 and Tune 27, 2005. The gr <br /> -:-} M anay, continued to be free of concentrations of any <br /> is the northernmost well in the <br /> sic <br /> f <br />