Laserfiche WebLink
[atl.—rat -J..5 IUt 14:44 rV:5.1.C.PUBS_IC WORKS TEL N4:209 468--2999 #568 P02/05-»---r .. <br /> i <br /> r <br /> Board of Supervisors -2- <br /> ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT'S, <br /> SECURITIES AND GRANT OF <br /> EASEMENT :FOR HILLSIDE GREENS <br /> The. Subdivislon improvements, in general, consist of a well, <br /> crater distribution exstem, equipment installation at the <br /> Par country Estates Well Site No. z, street lighting, and roadway <br /> improvements. The Subdivider, Daniel Schack, at al, arranged for <br /> construction to begin in 1986. As the water system and other <br /> improvements were nearing completion in early 1988, water quality <br /> tests on the Hillside Greene well indicated that excessive levels <br /> of nitrates were present. <br /> During 1988, the Subdivider submitted several incomplete <br /> proposals for water treatment systems, to correct the nitrate <br /> problem. After approximately six months, it became apparent the <br /> Subdivider was either unable or unwilling to correct the water <br /> system deficiencies. In September of 1988, the Board of <br /> Supervisors authorized a demand to Developers Insurance Company <br /> MICO) , as Surety, for completion of the Subdivider a obligations <br /> (B-88-1356) . Shortly thereafter, the Batik of America initiated <br /> foreclosure proceedings against the Subdivider. <br /> During 1989, RICO and Bank of America commissioned several <br /> studies and rehabilitative efforts, in an attempt to resolve the <br /> nitrate problem. These proved unsuccessful, and neither DICO nor <br /> Bank of America displayed a willingness to pursue the problem <br /> further. In April of 1990, County Counsel filed a lawsuit; but <br /> deferred service of the complaint to allow various Subdivision <br /> acquiaition proposals (by new developera) to run their course. <br /> In late 1992, a new development group (Par Green Partners) <br /> displayed a serious interest in acquiring the Subdivision and - <br /> resolving the water quality problems. They submitted a formal <br /> well rehabilitation proposal for County review in March of 1993. <br /> In early April, 1993, County Counsel served its previously filed <br /> lawsuit (against DICO, Bank of America, et al) , to meet statutory <br /> deadliness for service and protect the County'a legal interests. <br /> Par Green Part.ners formalized acquisition of the Hillside. Greene <br /> Subdivision in late April of this year. Their contractor began <br /> rehabilitation work at the Hillside Greens well Bite in early <br /> May. The origintal Hillside Greens well was abandoned, after <br /> rehabilitation effort.a failed, and a new well was drilled on the <br /> same lot. The new well meets State Title 22 water quality j <br /> guidelines. All remaining Subdivision improvements have been i <br /> completed. The Department of Public Works and Public Health � <br /> Services - Environmental Health, Division have determined that the <br /> work is complete and ready for acceptance by the Board of <br /> Bupsx�is�xs. <br /> j <br />