Laserfiche WebLink
i` <br /> Ili! <br /> The resample of the well i!'n July 2001 showed that contaminants were not detected. In <br /> our opinion, this Well does not show contaminants from the M & M Buildings UST <br /> j sources. The one-time detection again leads Wright to the interpretation of self-oiling <br /> equipment as the source of,the "contaminants". <br /> Discussion Summary <br /> The verylow concentrations of TPH contaminants in groundwater show a very degraded <br /> dissolved plume has moved from the tank pit area slightly to the north. Residual <br /> contaminants are present in the soil in the immediate vicinity of the former tank pits, <br /> which are probably slowly desorbing into groundwater. Groundwater flow as plotted in <br /> wells shows a northwesterly flow. While very low TPHD dissolved concentrations were <br /> observed in B-6, contaminants were not detected in MW-1 groundwater samples. <br /> If <br /> Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> Eight borings were advanced for mapping the dissolved TPH plume, and 3 monitoring <br /> wells installed at M&M Builders. Previous assessment had revealed very low TPHD <br /> dissolved levels just north of the former tank pits. Soil and groundwater sampling for this <br /> work essentially confirms I'Isubsurface hydrogeology and has, in our opinion defined the <br /> extent of the dissolved plume. The highest observed dissolved concentrations of <br /> degraded TPHD and TPHG occur in the immediate vicinity of the former tank pits. The <br /> TPHG and TPHD data for MW-3 water samples did not match their laboratory standards, <br /> suggestive of a highly degraded fuel contaminant depleted in volatile content. A deep <br /> boring placed adjacent to Iithe irrigation water well showed that contaminants were not <br /> detected in soil/sediment or groundwater. A resample of this Water Well shows that <br /> TPHD-like contaminants were not detected. In our opinion, there is no contamination of <br /> the Water Well interpreted Ito arise from the former tank pit area. <br /> II� <br /> It is Wrights understanding that the water well has not been used for drinking water, and <br /> that this well is used for irrigation of concrete aggregate mixing. <br /> Wright recommends that a quarterlymonitoring program for TPHG TPHD and BTEX <br /> IgP g <br /> and MTBE and oxygenates be performed for the next four quarters. If concentrations <br /> continue to show very low, stable and/or none detected levels, Wright will request that <br /> site closure be considered Mer the fourth quarter. <br /> Limitations <br /> This report has been prepared specifically for M&M Builders site at 8111 West Eleventh <br /> Street in Tracy, CA and was done according to the State and local agency suggested <br /> guidance documents for I'I these investigations. The interpretations, conclusions and <br /> recommendations made herein are based on professional judgment of the data and <br /> analysis for the soil and water samples collected on-site and should be reviewed in the <br /> I� <br /> Page 7 <br />