My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008909 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DAVIS
>
17521
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1100168
>
SU0008909 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:33:44 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 5:19:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU0008909
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1100168
STREET_NUMBER
17521
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
DAVIS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
APN
02516012
ENTERED_DATE
9/26/2011 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17521 N DAVIS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
9/25/2011 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\D\DAVIS\17521\PA-1100168\SU0008909\NL STDY.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
y SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Z ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 600 East Main Street, Stockton,CA 95202-3029 <br /> Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> •r pR <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> SITE LOCATION: PA#: 11 - da 1 68 <br /> / S 2 �V is Cpl ` L V�f• �Sa-� REPORT DATE: j] i3 <br /> S = Sutt-icirnt San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> 1 = InsutScirnl <br /> S I CO CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> Qg ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> ® El 1.2 Desctiption of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> ®- ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater,seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth,directional flow and gradient. <br /> 5 <br /> [ ❑ 2.2 Description4scussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. 5 <br /> 0 ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> J� <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ® ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> © ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> '� ❑ 3.3 DescnpTron of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. , 8 - // <br /> ! <br /> ri ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site b . <br /> ❑ ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model,if applicable. <br /> � S- // /'��jF,7r <br /> ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from sRe project to down adient wells, rivers. lakes etc. <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> © ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> rk B—// <br /> �C ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or anv other constituent of concern, at and/or around the project site. <br /> 4-12- <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ® ❑ 5.1 The report was signed,dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: _2 Reviewed Date: <br /> ERD 2"2 Page I of 2 see a Sub Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.