Laserfiche WebLink
' Shallow Test(s) <br /> ' TEST HOLE PERCOLATION RATE <br /> 1 (Parcel 1) 19 Min/In <br /> ' 2 (Parcel 2) 25 Min/In <br /> 3 (Parcel 3) 25 Min/In <br /> 4 (Parcel 4) 16 Min/In <br /> ' *See Results in Appendix. <br /> 6.7 Discussion of any potent ional problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or <br /> ' alternative septic system. In this area, the soils are classified as Jack Tone clay, Kingdon fine <br /> sandy loam, Tokay fine sandy loam, and Tujunga loamy sand. Due to this classification and <br /> percolation rate, a standard septic system similar to the one found on the other homesites would <br /> ' be recommended on the proposed parcels. <br /> 6.8 Discussion of percolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach <br /> ' fields needed at the site. Based on the results of the percolation rate and the soils profile, it is <br /> Dillon&Murphy's opinion that the subject proposed parcels are suited for a typical on-site sewage <br /> disposal system. The systems should be property designed and installed according to the current <br /> ' San Joaquin County criteria for standard septic systems. <br /> Based on the depth to groundwater in the area, and the size of the proposed parcels,it is our opinion <br /> ' on that the installation of any new proposed septic system, if property installed, should not <br /> adversely affect the quality of groundwater in the area. <br /> t 7.0 CONCLUSION SECTION <br /> The conclusions of this report are based on the information provided regarding the proposed <br /> development,the use of the subject property, and the site conditions as they existed at the time we <br /> excavated our test hole and performed the percolation test. It was assumed that the test hole and <br /> ' percolation test results are representative of the subsurface conditions in the general area. <br /> Our services were performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions proposed in accordance <br /> ' with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. The warranty is in lieu of all other <br /> warranties either expressed or implied. Test findings and statements of professional opinion do <br /> not constitute a guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied. <br /> 40.oF ass% � <br /> �q �r`h11Ur7`ir,} �y <br /> CD T <br /> C 7 <br /> X0 Jo Murphy <br /> R. .E. 45277 <br /> OF CP�1� <br /> ' 4 <br />